.
Some combinations of a verb + preposition need a noun or pronoun in between
ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF PREPOSITIONAL VERBS
Some English prepositions are able to combine closely with various verbs, which are then often called “prepositional”. Elsewhere in this blog simple verb-preposition combinations like DEPEND ON, COPE WITH and ATTEND TO are given extensive consideration (see, for example, 42. Unnecessary Prepositions, 44. Troublesome Prepositional Verbs and 108. Formal & Informal Words). Here I wish to examine prepositional verbs that have a noun expression between the verb and the preposition, as in PROVIDE (noun) WITH, SUSPECT (noun) OF and BLAME (noun) FOR.
Perhaps the main problem with verbs of this kind is difficulty remembering what the preposition is. The reason may be that the noun in the middle somehow prevents it from being linked as easily with the verb as it is in two-word combinations. To help overcome this problem, the approach will be to list common verbs like BLAME, along with their prepositions, to indicate some subclasses, and to warn of possible confusions.
An initial point to appreciate is that verbs like BLAME are always associated with two noun expressions after them rather than one, the second necessitated by the preposition in accordance with the general noun-requiring nature of prepositions (see 84. Seven Things to Know about Prepositions). This second noun, however, can often be left unsaid, along with its preposition, if its meaning can be understood from the context:
(a) Some theorists BLAME population growth (FOR the world’s poverty).
Some grammarians suggest that the two nouns after verbs like BLAME are two different grammatical objects (for details of objects, see 8. Object-Dropping Errors). They consider the noun after the preposition to be an object because the corresponding noun after simple prepositional verbs like DEPEND ON is one. However, the frequent possibility of dropping this noun and its preposition after verbs like BLAME without changing their meaning suggests it is not an object, as the same possibility does not usually exist with simple prepositional verbs.
.
VERBS WITH A VARIABLE OBJECT
Some verbs with a following object and preposition nearly always have the same noun for their object, while others allow more variation. Where variation exists, the object may be a person or a thing, but is more commonly a person. Here are some important verbs of this latter kind. The abbreviation SB means “somebody” while STH means “something”. What should each preposition be? (Answers below).
Answers
1. OF; 2. FOR; 3. WITH; 4 = OF; 5 = FOR; 6. WITH/FOR; 7. WITH; 8. WITH/TO; 9. TO; 10. WITH; 11. FOR/ON; 12. ABOUT/OVER; 13. OF; 14. OF; 15. INTO/BETWEEN; 16. IN; 17. TO; 18. WITH; 19. WITH; 20. OF; 21. TO; 22. IN; 23. FOR; 24. FROM; 25. WITH; 26. FOR; 27. TO; 28. OF; 29. FROM; 30. FOR; 31. WITH/FOR; 32. OF; 33. FROM; 34. TO; 35. FROM; 36. WITH; 37. OF; 38. FOR; 39. FOR; 40. WITH; 41. FOR/WITH; 42. OF/ABOUT
For more about ASSURE in this list, see 296. Tricky Word Contrasts 12, #1. For more about INFORM and WARN, see 279. Grammatical Differences between Citation Verbs.
The variability of some of these prepositions is notable. The choice between about and over after CONSULT seems a free one – the meaning does not change. However, with REWARD, the meaning does change: with indicates the reward, for the action that won it, like this:
(b) Parents can reward their children with small presents.
(c) Parents should reward their children for good behaviour.
It is even possible for both of these preposition phrase types to appear together in the same sentence. Similarly, after TREAT, with shows the treatment, for the problem necessitating it.
Among other verbs that allow a choice, WARN + of shows a potential or future problem, and + about an already-existing problem. CHARGE + for means “request payment”, but + with means “accuse”. DIVIDE + into is followed by the divisions, whereas + between (or among) shows their recipients. Into is also usable in the same way with the numerous synonyms of DIVIDE: BREAK, CATEGORISE, CLASSIFY, GROUP, ORGANISE, SEPARATE, SORT and SPLIT (see 162. Writing about Classifications).
The way of putting verbs like the above into the passive voice is fairly consistent: the subject becomes the first noun/pronoun after the verb – the one with no preposition in front: children in (b) and (c). One verb to be careful with is EXPLAIN. Consider this:
(d) Teachers must sometimes explain grammar to students.
The passive equivalent is:
(e) Grammar must sometimes be explained (by teachers) to students.
It is incorrect to say *Students must sometimes be explained grammar. The probable reason for this common error is the fact that some near-synonyms of EXPLAIN (SHOW, TEACH, TELL, INFORM, ADVISE) do allow or even require the person receiving the information to be the subject of their passive form (see 140. Words with Unexpected Grammar 2, #b).
SHOW, TEACH and TELL allow this because they are the type of verb with which to introduces an “indirect object” – a noun that is not their object but can be their subject when they are passive (see 126. Verbs with an Indirect Object). ADVISE and INFORM are not verbs of this type, despite their resemblance to them. Like other prepositional verbs containing a noun, they allow only their object (the noun before the preposition) to be the subject of their passive form (see 292. Synonym Pairs with Contrasting Grammar 2, #4).
One way to start (d) with students whilst still keeping EXPLAIN is by using HAVE: …must sometimes have grammar explained to them (see 116. Rarer Uses of HAVE).
One verb not listed above is INVEST…IN…. I have omitted it because it can also be used as an ordinary prepositional verb without an added noun (INVEST IN). The preposition is worth noting. Today in Britain one hears into occasionally instead of in. I am not sure how common this is; I wonder even whether it might be imported from American English.
Four verbs, BLAME, PRESENT, PROVIDE and SUPPLY, can reverse the positions of the two nouns after them, changing the preposition in the process. Compare:
BLAME SB FOR STH = BLAME STH ON SB
PRESENT SB WITH STH = PRESENT STH TO SB
PROVIDE SB WITH STH = PROVIDE STH FOR SB
SUPPLY SB WITH STH = SUPPLY STH FOR/TO SB
Note that REWARD is not among these verbs: its object is always the receiver of a reward (SB), not the reward itself (STH).
PRESENT, PROVIDE and SUPPLY need to be handled carefully because, like EXPLAIN, they have a meaning close to that of many verbs, such as GIVE, which can have two following nouns without any preposition at all (see 126. Verbs with an Indirect Object). Again, the closeness in meaning does not guarantee that the preposition can be similarly dropped!
.
VERBS WITH A FIXED OBJECT
Combinations of a particular verb with a particular object and a particular preposition, e.g. MAKE USE OF, fall into the category of collocations – non-grammatical word partnerships (see 16. Ways of Distinguishing Similar Words, #5). Other examples are:
APPLY -SELF TO
ATTACH IMPORTANCE TO
AVAIL -SELF OF
CATCH SIGHT (or A GLIMPSE) OF
CONTENT -SELF WITH
DECLARE WAR ON
DO WORK (or A JOB) ON
EXERT PRESSURE ON
GIVE AN ACCOUNT OF
GIVE (or PAY) ATTENTION TO
GIVE WAY TO
HAVE AN EFFECT ON
HAVE TROUBLE WITH
HELP -SELF TO
KEEP PACE WITH
KEEP TRACK OF
LOSE TOUCH WITH
LOSE TRACK OF
MAKE ALLOWANCE(S) FOR
MAKE AMENDS FOR
MAKE AN EXAMPLE OF
MAKE FUN OF
MAKE MUCH OF
PUT AN END (or A STOP) TO
PUT/ PLACE EMPHASIS ON
PUT THE BLAME ON
SET FIRE TO
SET ONE’S HEART ON
TAKE ACCOUNT OF
TAKE CARE OF
TAKE NOTE OF
TAKE STOCK OF
An interesting feature of these expressions is that many are longer equivalents of a single verb. For example, catch a glimpse of corresponds to glimpse, keep track of to track, and take note of to note. For suggestions about their use, see 39. “Decide” or “Make a Decision”?. For more on the the verbs that they include, see 173. “Do Research” or “Make Research”?. For more examples with HAVE, MAKE and TAKE, see 116. Rarer Uses of HAVE, 141. Ways of Using MAKE and 264. Variations in the Use of TAKE, #19.
Note that GIVE ATTENTION and PAY ATTENTION mean different things. Consider this:
(f) Einstein gave/ paid attention to the problem of gravity.
Gave here suggests that Einstein merely turned his attention away from something else (see 244. Special Uses of GIVE, #5). Paid, however, suggests that he increased his attention to the maximum: perhaps he had been only a little interested before in the problem of gravity, or even daydreaming! There is an option of adding his (or other possessive adjective) after GIVE. An alternative to GIVE is TURN, though then his or equivalent must be present.
Also noteworthy about GIVE/ PAY ATTENTION TO is the need for any following verb to have -ing: one must say, for example, to solving, not to solve, the reason being that to here is a preposition, not the to of infinitive verbs. This is the same kind of problem that can occur with two-word prepositional verbs like TAKE TO (see 35. Words Followed by “to -ing”). Other object-containing verbs that might give it include APPLY ONESELF TO (see 261. Words with Complicated Grammar 3, #1), ATTACH IMPORTANCE TO, PUT A STOP TO and INTRODUCE (sb) TO.
Finally, caution is needed with TAKE CARE OF. Its common meaning is not “supervise” (English uses LOOK AFTER for that), but rather “cater for the needs of”, “resolve” or “deal with”, as in take care of complaints (see 276. Tricky Word Contrasts 11, #7).