251. The Grammar of “Only”

.

“Only” has various adverb uses, and can also be an adjective or conjunction

THE MULTI-USE NATURE OF “ONLY”

Most experienced users of English would be very quick to say, if asked whether they were familiar with the basic word only, that they certainly were. If they were further asked to say what they knew about this word, they would surely give a good description of what it means and where in a sentence it is typically used. However, I am not so sure that the full range of grammatical possibilities would be easily described.

Only in fact occurs in quite a wide range of grammatical structures, and is consequently a good example of what I call a “multi-use” word (see 3. Multi-Use Words). The present post aims to highlight some of the more esoteric grammatical uses. This is a similar kind of approach to that taken in various other parts of this blog that make a detailed study of a small familiar word (for a list, click on the SPECIFIC WORDS tab above).

.

FUNDAMENTAL MEANINGS

As a preliminary, a brief look at the main meanings of only may prove useful. The adjective meaning is “not accompanied by other instances or amounts”. For example, both the only explanation and the only two explanations mean no other explanations exist.

Common adjective synonyms are sole and lone. Like them, only cannot be alone after BE or similar (see 184. Adjectives with Limited Mobility, #3), but can combine there with the … one(s) (see 263. Uses of “One” and “Ones”, #6). One adjective that is not a synonym is unique. It combines the meaning of only with the idea of “unequalled” (see 284. Words with a Surprising Meaning, #13).

Sometimes adjectival only is necessitated by the choice of noun (i.e. it is “collocational” – see 16. Ways of Distinguishing Similar Words, #5). For example a child without siblings is usually an only child.

As an adverb only is again often found before a noun (see 313. Adverbs Linked Closely to a Noun, #2). It must precede any use of the, a(n) or similar. Thus it is an adverb in only the explanation. It carries the same meaning as the adjective, but also one of various other meanings, depending on the context. For example, only one week would variably suggest:

INSUFFICIENT: schooling time in a year

IMPRESSIVE: time taken to write a dissertation

UNIMPORTANT: time saved over ten years

These extra meanings make adverbial only useful in data interpretations (see 115. Surveying Numerical Data). Sometimes, though, there can be uncertainty about which meaning applies, so that a more precise synonym becomes advisable. For example, just is more suggestive of impressive achievement, while merely can more definitely indicate unimportance.

One other notable use of adverbial only is before adverbial expressions indicating time of occurrence. In past ones, such as only last month or only just, the time is implied to be surprisingly recent; in future ones, such as only tomorrow, later than desired. Only ever means “always without exception” (see 272. Uses of “Ever”).

.

SPECIAL GRAMMATICAL USES

Probably the most familiar grammatical aspect of only, besides its adjective / adverb usability, is the multiplicity of sentence positions that the adverb use can occupy, with consequent potential for misunderstandings. I exclude it here because it is widely described elsewhere. Six other uses are as follows.

1. With a Conjunction

Adverbial only can precede some conjunctions to limit their meaning. For example, only when… means no other times are possible besides the one specified; only because… works similarly with reasons or causes; and only if… does the same with conditions (see “Open Conditions” in 179. Deeper Meanings of “if”).

It is mainly “subordinating” conjunctions that can follow only (i.e. not those that must go between two linked statements, like and, but and or – see 174. Eight Things to Know about Conjunctions, #3). The commonest possibilities express time (when, while, after, until, since), cause (because, since, seeing that), condition (if, provided that) or purpose (so that, in order to). Combination with although is unlikely.

When only follows a conjunction, it is usually combining with the next word rather than the conjunction. However, one exceptional case involves if (if only…) to express a wish for an unfulfilled past or present, or an unlikely future. The tense choices are the same as after wish that… (see 254. Tricky Word Contrasts 10, #6).

There is also a historical description use that perhaps expresses a less personal, more general regret (see 282. Features of History Writing, #12):

(a) If only the dangers of smoking had been known, much suffering would have been avoided.

For more on wishing, see 238. Using a Verb to Perform its Action, #6.

.

2. Starting a Sentence

After a starting only, some or all of the accompanying verb often goes before its subject, like in direct questions (so-called “inversion”):

(b) Only children DO they allow inside.

(c) Only when vaccination is possible WILL the virus BE DEFEATED.

In (b), the “auxiliary” verb do precedes they, the subject of allow. In (c), will precedes the virus, the subject of will be defeated. The earlier verb is in (c) does not precede vaccination because it follows when, which postpones the influence of only (see 37. Subordination).

The main situation where no inversion follows a starting only is when the subject of its accompanying verb follows immediately:

(d) Only children can enter.

When only is not the first word, inversion is not normally allowed. A major exception, however, is in some sentences starting with not only…. This expression introduces information implied to be already familiar to the addressee, the main point of the sentence being in a later but (also) statement (see 64. Double Conjunctions):

(e) NOT ONLY will the virus be defeated, BUT the world’s economy will also recover.

Here, two different verbs are used (will be defeated, will recover), with different subjects (virus, economy). In such situations, not only needs to start the sentence and requires inversion.

The situation is slightly different when two different verbs have the same subject (one expressed with a pronoun):

(f) Not only will the virus be defeated but it will never reappear.

Again, with not only at the start, inversion is necessary. However, such sentences also allow not only to be later, ruling out inversion and making the pronoun optional: The virus will not only be…but (it) will….

A third possibility is two different subjects with the same verb:

(g) Not only the virus will be defeated but also economic instability.

Here, not only must start, but inversion is optional. The verb is usually mentioned only once, either between the two subjects or after them. For more about inversion outside questions, see 307. Word Order Variations, #3.

.

3. Before “to”

Only can precede a to statement at the end of a sentence:

(h) Motorways speed up traffic movement, only to cause jams elsewhere.

In such sentences, the to statement expresses an unexpected and often undesirable consequence of what is said before it. The subject of the to verb will be the same as that of the earlier, main verb (here motorways), unless a different subject is mentioned in a for phrase after only.

For a fuller description of this use of only, see 247. Exotic Grammar Structures 6, #1.

.

4. Indicating an Exception

Exceptions are members of a general class that contradict or fail to follow a rule or generalization about it. Their mention usually needs an accompanying statement of the rule or generalization, either in the same sentence or separately beforehand – rather as happens with examples (see 1. Simple Example-Giving) or lists (see 122. Signpost Words in Multi-Sentence Lists).

Only is useful for naming all (not some) of the exceptions to a generalization expressed in a preceding sentence:

(i) Few creatures survive extreme cold. Only certain micro-organisms have this ability.

As this suggests, the exception wording (underlined) is usually a noun phrase, with only directly before it. The rest of the sentence often just paraphrases the main part of the rule, but not always (see 215. Naming Exceptions, under “Other Options”).

.

5. As a Conjunction

This is a rather informal use of only, uncommon in professional writing. Some books say it means but, but I think it is narrower. Compare:

(j) Cycling has numerous benefits, only there is a risk of accidents.

(k) Accommodation is cheap, only the location is isolated.

(l) Train travel would be easy, only the state will not subsidise it.

In all these, only is easily replaceable by but: both are “coordinating” conjunctions (located between two linked statements, unable to go before them as although can). The sole meaning difference seems to be that only is clearer that no other possibility exists. With but, this interpretation is possible but not inevitable.

In (j), the meaning is very similar to the exception-showing one described above: the words after only name a disadvantage outside a general advantageous trend. In (k), a single advantage (cheap) is compared with a single disadvantage (isolated), so a contrast rather than exception is being indicated. Sentence (l) mentions an unreal idea using would (easy train travel), then gives a reason for the unreality.

Although but can usually replace only, the reverse is not always the case. Only but, for example, is possible in the following, despite the similarity to (k):

(m) The storm was fierce but the ship survived.

A requirement for using only in sentences like (j) and (k) is perhaps that it should introduce something undesirable. The absence of such an idea in (m) seems to explain why but is necessary there. Only would sentences like (l) seem to allow mention of something desirable after only, as in the following rewording of (l):

(n) Train travel would be difficult, only the state is subsidising it.

.

6. Before “too” + Adverb / Adjective

Only too is close in meaning to “very”. There are two uses. One combines the “very” meaning of too with the idea of “disastrous”:

(o) Addiction can develop only too easily.

Here, only too easily indicates ease that is so great as to be disastrous. Similarly, is only too true indicates disastrously definite truth.

This use of only too can be paraphrased with all too… . It is unlikely to start a sentence. Only too… at the start of a sentence is likely to have a more standard, alternative-denying meaning of only:

(p) Only too late were the dangers understood.

Here, the denied alternatives are other times, such as “early”, “in time” and “late”.

The second use of only too… meaning “very” accompanies adjectives expressing a positive human state, such as happy:

(q) The villagers were only too happy to demonstrate their skills.

Other possible adjectives here include eager, glad, keen, pleased, ready and willing.

.

7. In Predictions

Only can follow predictive will (or equivalent: see 147. Types of Future Meaning, #1) to predict occurrence of something unwanted instead of what is planned. A common usage is …will only make matters worse.

250. Synonym Pairs with Contrasting Grammar 1

.

Sometimes, two synonyms differ in their grammar, making confusions more likely

SIMILAR WORDS AND SIMILAR USAGE

It is probable that the way language learners use a new word or structure is greatly influenced by the way they know words or structures like it are used. This is because very often words and structures that seem somehow similar do follow similar rules, thus encouraging the idea that knowing the rule for one saves separately learning the rules for the others. The rules in question are not just of grammar – word formation, spelling and pronunciation can also be involved.

This blog provides numerous examples of similar words following the same rule. Consequence verbs like CAUSE generally allow a following noun + to verb (see 208. Verbs with an Object + Infinitive, #7). Emotion adjectives like happy can have a following verb with either to or -ing (see 203. Expanding an Adjective with Words after it). Verbs ending in -ATE become action nouns with -ation (see 249. Action Noun Endings). And -age at the end of a multi-syllable noun is often (but not always) pronounced to rhyme with bridge rather than wage or large (see 135. French Influences on English Vocabulary, #3).

However, a problem with relying on already-learned words for information about using a new one is that in surprisingly many cases the latter follows a different rule, so that applying the familiar rule creates an error. Errors of this kind are widely documented in this blog in posts entitled Words with Unexpected Grammar, as well as in 41. Unexpected Vowels in Derived Words and 188. Causes of Common Spelling Mistakes (#2).

What these other posts rarely highlight, however, is words that might be incorrectly used through the influence of just a single other word. Intuitively, differing from a group seems more likely to cause error than differing from just one other word, since a group is likely to allow more opportunities for its grammar to be encountered, noticed and remembered, ready for application to the new word.

Nevertheless, I quite often come across incorrectly-used words that seem to have been bent to the differing grammatical requirements of just one or two synonyms. This suggests that awareness of synonym pairs with differing grammar might have some error-prevention value. Seven are presented below; for more, see 292. Synonym Pairs with Contrasting Grammar 2.

.

POTENTIALLY TROUBLESOME SYNONYM PAIRS

In the following synonym pairs, at least one of the words has the potential to be incorrectly used through the influence of the other.

1. REACH – ARRIVE

Both of these verbs indicate completion of some or all of a journey, and must accompany information about where this takes place. With REACH this information must be a noun in the object position with no intervening preposition (…reached the city). In other words, REACH is an ordinary transitive verb requiring a place-referring “object” (see 8. Object-Dropping Errors).

ARRIVE, by contrast, need not always be followed by the relevant place information: if this is clear from a previous mention or the speech situation, ARRIVE can be used alone. Moreover, if a place does need to be mentioned, it must follow the preposition at, in or into. ARRIVE is classified grammatically as an intransitive verb that optionally allows a following adverb phrase of place.

Both verbs are sometimes used incorrectly like the other. It should be noted, though, that an unnecessary preposition after REACH (usually to or at) may have other causes than (or besides) the way ARRIVE is used. The way verbs with similar meaning are used in other languages could be a factor, and there are also other aspects of English that may play a part. For details, see 42. Unnecessary Prepositions.

.

2. STOP – CEASE

STOP is usable both with an object (X stopped Y) and without (X stopped). In the former, the stopping applies to the object (Y); in the latter, to the subject (X). This is a property of numerous English Verbs (see 4. Verbs that Don’t Have to be Passive).

The object of STOP may represent the stopped activity or its performer. Activities are shown by either a noun (e.g. work) or -ing verb (e.g. working). A verb cannot be an infinitive (with to). An infinitive after STOP would indicate a purpose (of X), not a stopped activity (see 208. Verbs with an Object + Infinitive, #7).

CEASE is also usable with or without an object, but any object has to be an activity, not a performer. If this is expressed by a verb, both -ing and to are possible, the choice depending on how the action is perceived. This possibility of to after CEASE may partly explain why to is often incorrectly used after STOP.

.

3. ADVISE – RECOMMEND

These verbs are not complete synonyms (see 187. Advising and Recommending), but they both need an indication of a desirable action and who should perform it. The simplest way to give this is with a following that:

(a) We advise/recommend that   customers   visit our website.

Another structure possible with both is a directly following -ing verb or action noun, without any noun in between: recommend visiting above (not *customers visiting), or a visit to. In such cases the subject noun will just be implicit, though pronoun ideas like you before -ing can be expressed with a possessive (your visiting).

A third possibility with ADVISE – but not RECOMMEND – is a following noun + to verb: advise customers to visit. Using this structure after RECOMMEND is probably the main error that the meaning and grammatical similarities between these two verbs cause among inexperienced English users.

.

4. REFER TO – CALL

These verbs enable someone or something to be named or described. They need an object noun referring to the possessor of the name or description, followed immediately by either a second noun-like expression representing the name, or a noun/adjective representing the description (see 206. Ways of Conveying a Name), e.g.:

(b) Americans refer to Florida as “the sunshine state”.

Here, the object noun Florida represents the possessor of the subsequent description “the sunshine state”. Note as before the latter. If refer to is replaced by call, as must disappear.

Grammatically, “the sunshine state” above is an “object complement” – necessitated by the use of refer to and describing its object (see 220. Features of Complements). Object complements as a whole either need, allow or forbid as in front, according to the verb they depend on. REFER TO is as-requiring; CALL is as-forbidding. There is no obvious reason for this – it just needs to be memorised. The common error is adding as after CALL. For a list of verbs that need or allow an object complement, along with an indication of as usage, see 92. Verbs with an Object + “as”.

.

5. HELP – FACILITATE

These verbs both involve an action or event that is being enabled to happen more easily, plus someone or something performing or experiencing it (i.e. its “subject”). In one use, the grammar with HELP and FACILITATE is the same:

(c) Salt helps/facilitates (vehicles’) free movement on icy roads.

Here, the assisted action is expressed by an object noun (movement), and its subject is shown or implied by an optional possessive noun (vehicles’). Movement is an “action” noun – the usual means of expressing the assisted action in noun form (see 131. Uses of “Action” Nouns, #5).

Another grammatical similarity between the two verbs is that they both allow the assisted action to be expressed by a verb. However, this is done in different ways. After HELP, the verb must be in the to (infinitive) form with the subject noun before it – helps vehicles to move freely above. The subject noun (vehicles) cannot be omitted (see 65. Verbs that Mean “must” or “can”).

After FACILITATE, by contrast, a verb expressing the assisted action or event must be in the -ing (gerund) form, and the subject noun can be added or omitted – facilitates (vehicles) moving freely above. Subject nouns are often in the possessive form – vehicles’ above (see the end of 232. Verbs with an Object + “-ing”).

One final difference is that HELP can omit mention of the assisted action, leaving just its subject (helps vehicles), but FACILITATE cannot (*facilitates vehicles).

Common errors with HELP and FACILITATE are (a) using HELP + infinitive without a noun in between; (b) using FACILITATE + action subject without mentioning the action; and (c) making the wrong to/-ing choice after both HELP and FACILITATE.

.

6. but – however

These words indicate the same logical link between a statement after them and one before: that the one after is highlighting something different or logically surprising compared to what the one before says (see 20. Problem Connectors, #3):

(d) (DIFFERENT) The North IS arid but the South IS rainy.

(e) (SURPRISING) The South HAS less sunshine but its temperatures ARE higher.

The grammatical difference between but and however is that but accompanies its two statements in one sentence, while however needs two. To appreciate why, first observe that (d) and (e) both contain two verbs (capitalised).

It is a general English rule that a new verb necessitates a new sentence, unless accompanied by wording or punctuation that makes a single sentence possible (see 30. When to Write a Full Stop). But is this kind of wording: it belongs to the major verb-accommodating category called conjunctions. However, by contrast, is not this kind of wording, so that its two partner statements need a separating full stop. Many grammarians classify however as a “(logical) connector”. For a more detailed comparison of conjunctions and connectors, see 40. Conjunctions versus Connectors.

The commonest error that seems to result from this grammatical contrast is using however as if it were a conjunction, with either a comma replacing its necessary full stop or nothing at all (see 138. Test your Command of Grammar 1, #8). A similar error is sometimes made with therefore (used like so), then (used like and) and alternatively (used like or).

.

7. bags – luggage

The grammatical difference between these often synonymous nouns is, of course, that bags is “countable” and luggage is “uncountable”. What that means is not that bags can be counted and luggage cannot: since both words often refer to the same thing, they must both be able or not able to be counted. Instead, “countable” and “uncountable” are grammatical descriptions. “Countable” nouns can be singular or plural but when singular need a(n) or the or equivalent before them, while “uncountable” nouns cannot be plural and can be singular without any preceding word (see 14. Noun Countability Clues 1).

A common error is to use uncountable luggage in the plural form *luggages. If there is a need to say luggage rather than bags (for example when luggage contains items that are not bags), and if a plural nature needs to be communicated (e.g. in I have two…), then one can say pieces of luggage.

English has a number of other noun synonyms with differing countability, such as advice/tips, legislation/laws and software/apps (see 180. Nouns that Count the Uncountable).