Many grammar errors occur with words that do not follow the same rule as words like them in meaning
THE MEANING OF “UNEXPECTED GRAMMAR”
This post is about grammar errors that are probably caused by a word having a different grammatical need from that of similar-meaning words in the same grammatical class. For example, a verb after ENJOY is often incorrectly given to instead of -ing, probably because to is needed after similar-meaning verbs such as LIKE, LOVE, PREFER and WANT.
This kind of error cause seems a powerful one. For Guinlist posts with further examples, see 10. Words with Unexpected Grammar 1. See also 250. Synonym Pairs with Contrasting Grammar 1. Not all grammar errors, though, are induced by other words: one alternative cause is a word having very variable usage (see 201. Words with Complicated Grammar 1).
In order to present a new set of common errors probably caused by unexpected grammar, I once again offer an “odd-one-out” exercise. For each error a list of similar words is presented along with a sentence where they are all grammatically correct except the problematic one, which has to be identified. My prediction is that many readers will not correctly identify the problem word in every case. Answers are given and explained later.
.
IDENTIFYING WORDS WITH UNEXPECTED GRAMMAR
In considering the grammatical possibility of each listed word below, keep in mind that grammatical possibility is not the same as logical likelihood (see 100. What is a Grammar Error?). Some of the suggestions below would give a rather unlikely meaning but are still grammatically possible.
(a) Successful firms can give their employees more money.
AWARD, GRANT, HAND, LEAVE, PAY, SUPPLY, SEND
(b) Parents need to teach children how to speak politely.
ADVISE, EXPLAIN, INFORM, SHOW, TELL.
(c) Innovative companies expect to have a golden future.
AIM, APPEAR, DESIRE, INTEND, LOOK FORWARD, MEAN, PLAN, SEEM, WANT.
(d) Football trainers need to highlight fitness.
ACCENTUATE, EMPHASISE, FOCUS, STRESS, UNDERLINE.
(e) Everyone has an opportunity to succeed.
A CHANCE, THE ABILITY, FREEDOM, A POSSIBILITY, THE CAPACITY, THE POTENTIAL, PERMISSION.
(f) The road will be open soon.
CLEAR, CONTINUE, DRY, EMPTY, FREE, LEVEL, NARROW, SLOW
(g) Some people see rural life as boring.
DESCRIBE, CALL, VIEW, REFER TO, PERCEIVE, LABEL, CRITICISE
(h) Free trade leads goods to be cheaper.
ALLOWS, CAUSES, COMPELS, ENABLES, FORCES, INDUCES, MAKES, OBLIGES, PERMITS
.
ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS
Here are the above sentences with the incorrect words inserted:
(a) *Successful firms can supply their employees more money.
This sentence has two nouns after the underlined verb (their employees and more money), neither of them preceded by a preposition. Some verbs can be used like this, but not SUPPLY, which needs a preposition before one of the nouns.
There are two different kinds of verb that can go before two nouns without either of them needing a preposition. One kind – not relevant here – needs both of the nouns to refer to the same thing. The second noun is then said to be an “object complement” (see (g) below).
The other kind of verb that can have two following nouns without a preposition – illustrated by all of the ones listed earlier for this sentence except SUPPLY – needs the first of the two nouns to be a beneficiary or recipient of the verb’s action or state. This noun is commonly called an “indirect” object (see 126. Verbs with an Indirect Object. The problem with SUPPLY, of course, is that it too can accompany two nouns, one a beneficiary or recipient, but unexpectedly it must always have a preposition before one of them.
SUPPLY is not the only verb that is similar in meaning to indirect-object verbs without being one of them. Others include CREATE (…something for somebody), PRESENT (…something to somebody) and PROVIDE (…something for somebody). Note also that BENEFIT allows only a single following noun. To mention two, you have to say bring the benefit (…of something to someone).
There are actually two ways to correct the error above: adding either with before more money or to before their employees at the end (see 123. Prepositional Verbs Containing a Noun). For a further example of this error type, see 281. Verbs with Unexpected Grammar 4, #e.
(b) *Parents need to explain children how to speak politely.
The problem here is very similar to that in (a): EXPLAIN allows a beneficiary to be named before its object, but not without a preposition. The preposition needed before children here is to. EXPLAIN is best treated, like PROVIDE, as a prepositional verb containing a noun. Another verb like it is DEMONSTRATE.
The “noun” after children in (b) is how to speak politely. It is an unusual kind of noun-like phrase because it contains no noun. It is classified as noun-like because it is able (thanks to how) to occupy a typical position of a noun in a sentence (object of a verb). It is actually an indirect question – a structure that is typically noun-like (see 185. Noun Synonyms of Question Words). For details of the particular kind of indirect question that it is, see 105. Questions with a “to” Verb.
Some of the verbs listed earlier for this sentence (ADVISE, TEACH, TELL) can replace a following indirect question with a to verb (teach children to…) (see 208. Verbs with an Object + Infinitive, # 11). However, this is again not possible with EXPLAIN – the explained idea must normally be either an indirect question placed after a to phrase (explained to X how…) or a noun/pronoun placed before one (explained Y to X).
(c) *Innovative companies look forward to enjoy a golden future.
LOOK FORWARD TO is a “phrasal-prepositional” verb (see 139. Phrasal Verbs). In other words, it expresses a single meaning (“anticipate happily”) in three words, including an adverb (forward) and a preposition (to). The fact that to is a preposition explains why look forward to cannot fit into (c): prepositions need any following verb to have -ing (see 70. Gerunds), an ending absent from enjoy.
The reason why enjoy is correct after the other listed verbs is that they are of the more common kind that require any directly-following verb to be in the infinitive form, made with a non-prepositional to (see 302. Verbs with a Partner Infinitive). Verbs needing a prepositional to directly after them are quite rare – for more examples, see 35. Words Followed by “to -ing”. LOOK FORWARD TO is tricky in another respect too: 271. Tricky Grammar Contrasts 3, #1.
(d) *Football trainers need to focus fitness.
This needs on after focus. Without it, FOCUS means “make (an image) sharper”, with it, “highlight” like the other listed verbs. Not all prepositional verbs acquire such a different meaning without their preposition; for others that do, see 44. Troublesome Prepositional Verbs).
Note the presence of EMPHASISE among the other verbs. It cannot have on, but is often incorrectly given it. One reason is probably the use of on with FOCUS (and CONCENTRATE). Another is perhaps the possibility of on after the similarly-spelt noun emphasis (see 42. Unnecessary Prepositions).
(e) *Everyone has a possibility to succeed.
This error is the topic of 78. Infinitive versus Preposition after Nouns. A verb after possibility, saying what is possible, needs of -ing, not to.
The tendency to use the to form of a verb after possibility probably has more reasons than just the correctness of to after similar-meaning nouns like those listed above (and like various others: see the end of 239. Noun Phrases Made with a “to” Verb). To is correct after the adjective possible, and in various other languages its equivalent is normal after an equivalent of possibility. For more about possibility, see 181. Expressing Possibility.
(f) *The road will be continue soon.
Continue is a regular verb, a word type that after BE always needs -ed (making a passive form) or -ing (making a continuous active). Here, the more likely ending is -ed (will be continued).
All of the other words listed above would also be correct with -ed, but they are not incorrect without it. The reason is that they are usable not just as verbs but also as adjectives, which do not allow -ed or -ing after BE. For a discussion of the meaning difference between having and not having a possible -ed after BE, see 66. Types of Passive Verb Meaning.
There are, in fact, many more English spellings than those listed that have both an adjective and a verb use (see 304. Adjectives Made from a Verb, #1). Verbs, moreover, seem to have a greater general similarity to adjectives than to other types of word (see 283. Lesser-Known Features of Adjectives, #3). These factors must inevitably sometimes cause a spelling with only one of the two uses to be given the other, like continue above.
For more about errors with this cause, see 142. Grammar Errors with Passive Verbs and 231. Confusions of Similar Structures 3, #4.
(g) *Some people call rural life as boring.
Call cannot have as after its object (rural life): boring alone is enough. Boring is an adjective here used as an “object complement” – a word (noun or adjective) that some verbs need after their object to name, describe or equate to it (see 220. Features of Complements, #1).
Most verbs with an object complement need as before it (see 92. Verbs with an Object + “As”). CALL is a rare exception. Its alternative use as a naming verb may explain why, since naming verbs in general are slightly less likely than other complement-taking ones to have as (see 206. Ways of Conveying a Name).
NAME is another naming verb that can cause error (see 236. Tricky Word Contrasts 9, #2).
(h) *Free trade makes goods to be cheaper.
The verbs listed for this sentence all link a cause (their subject) with a consequence statement involving their object (goods) and a verb in the infinitive (to) form (see 208. Verbs with an Object + Infinitive, #7). The wording after makes should have a slightly different form.
After the object of causative MAKE, to be must usually be left unsaid, leaving a noun or adjective as the next word – cheaper above (exceptionally, when BE expresses an action rather than state, be without to is necessary: see 271. Tricky Grammar Contrasts 3, #3). On the other hand, if the infinitive after MAKE is not to be, it must be present, but still without to (see 148. Infinitive Verbs without “to”, #2). One could, for example, say become in (h) instead of to be.
A noun or adjective directly after the object of MAKE is another example of an object complement. MAKE is unusual in disallowing the use of both to be and as: with most verbs one or the other is allowed or even required (see 92. Verbs with an Object + “As”). For more about MAKE, see 141. Ways of Using MAKE and 182. Structures with a Double Meaning 2, #4.