71. Gerund and Participle Uses of “-ing”

.

Verbs with “-ing” are either gerunds (resembling nouns) or participles (resembling adjectives)

GENERAL OBSERVATIONS

Adding -ing to a verb gives it the properties of either an adjective or a noun. In the first case, it is sometimes a participle (of the so-called “present” variety), sometimes a true adjective (see 245. Adjectives with a Participle Ending). In the second case, it is sometimes a gerund and sometimes a true noun (see 240. Nouns that End with “-ing”).

The participle and gerund uses of -ing are considered individually in this blog in 52. Participles Placed Just After their Noun and 70. Gerunds. There is also a separate post on participles and gerunds made with having (267. Participles and Gerunds with “Having”). Here, -ing participles and gerunds are considered together in order to highlight their similarities and differences. 

The two main similarities between -ing participles and gerunds are their ability to describe a directly-following noun, and, in other situations, their retention of verb properties like having a subject/object and being usable with an adverb. Differences within these areas are as follows.

.

DIFFERENCES WITH A DIRECTLY-FOLLOWING NOUN

Participles describing a directly-following noun are practically the same as adjectives. Examples are a helping hand (similar to a supportive hand), falling prices (cp. low prices) and boiling water (cp. hot water). Like adjectives, these -ing forms can be placed after their noun with that is or that are in between, e.g. a hand that is helping/ friendly, prices that are falling/ low (some can even drop that is/are, e.g. the picture emerging – see 52. Participles Placed Just after their Noun).

Gerunds, by contrast, describe a following noun just as ordinary nouns can (see 38. Nouns Used Like Adjectives). Examples are a walking stick, a driving lesson and opening times. One indication that this use is more noun-like is its inability to be paraphrased with that is/are without making unlikely phrases like *a stick that is walking. Another indication is that the -ing word can follow its noun with a preposition in between: a stick for walking, a lesson about/in driving, times of opening (see 136. Types of Description by Nouns). Moreover, pre-noun gerunds often have more spoken emphasis than participles (see 243. Pronunciation Secrets, #4).

With a few -ing verbs, the tests for both a participle and a gerund succeed. For example, a smoking room can become either a room that is smoking (participle) or a room for (tobacco) smoking (gerund). This does not, however, make the test invalid; it merely shows that some -ing words can describe a following noun as either a participle or a gerund, the meaning being different in each case (see 124. Structures with a Double Meaning 1, #1).

These features of pre-noun gerunds and participles even exist when they have an object, as in house-hunting days and time-consuming chores. The former involves a gerund because with reversed order of or for is necessary; the latter involves a participle because it needs which are. A further difference here is that the former can stand alone in noun positions (e.g. house hunting is…), whereas the latter cannot (see the end of 223. Uses of Hyphens). For more participle examples, see the end of 106. Word-like Suffixes.

.

DIFFERENCES WHEN “-ing” WORDS DO NOT DESCRIBE A DIRECTLY-FOLLOWING NOUN

Participles and gerunds are both more like verbs when they are not describing a following noun, but the fundamental adjective/noun difference is still evident. .

1. Usage at the Start of a Sentence

The difference can be seen in these examples:

(a) Travelling at over 200 km/h, the new trains make a huge difference. (PARTICIPLE)

(b) Travelling at over 200 km/h makes a huge difference. (GERUND)

The word travelling in both sentences is like a verb because it has an adverbial phrase, at over 200 km per hour. Other -ing words might have an object, e.g. transporting passengers above instead of travelling. At the same time, however, the participle use of travelling in (a) is like an adjective, while the gerund use in (b) is like a noun.

Travelling is like an adjective in (a) because it has a neighbouring noun (trains) to describe (see 6. Adjectives with no Noun 1: People-Naming). This use of a participle before its noun is not the same as the one considered earlier; it allows words to be placed in between, plus a comma (see 75. How to Avoid “Dangling” Participles). The participle can also follow its noun:

(c) The new trains, travelling at over 200 km/h, make a huge difference.

Commas may or may not be needed in such cases: the rules are the same as for commas with who, which and that (see 34. Relative Pronouns and Commas and 52. Participles Placed Just After their Noun).

In (b), on the other hand, there is no neighbouring noun for travelling to describe. Therefore travelling, not trains, has to be the subject of the verb makes, so that it is acting like a noun and must be a gerund. This use of gerunds can look very like the noun-describing one. Consider the following:

(d) Growing vegetables requires time and money.

How can we tell that the noun vegetables here is the object of growing and not “described” by it? The clue is the singular form of the verb (requires). This prevents the plural vegetables from being the subject, so that growing must be the subject instead, with vegetables its object (giving the meaning “causing vegetables to grow”).

If the verb had been require, the subject would have been vegetables, and growing would have had to be a gerund or participle describing it (a participle is actually more likely, because it creates a more likely meaning, “vegetables which are growing”, than the gerund meaning “vegetables for growing”).

Unfortunately, if the noun after the -ing word is singular, the main verb ending cannot help, with the result that a double meaning can occur, like this:

(e) Cooking chocolate is good for you.

It is not clear whether this is about “the cooking of chocolate” (gerund + object) or “chocolate for cooking” (gerund + described noun). It could even mean “chocolate which is cooking” (participle + described noun). Usually, however, the intended meaning of this structure will, like that of most other ambiguous ones, be made clear by the context of its use (see 124. Structures with a Double Meaning 1, #1).

.

2. Usage Later in a Sentence

One familiar later use of -ing participles is actually inside a main verb to form “continuous” tenses, e.g.:

(f) The frequency of floods is increasing.

This use has to be distinguished from that of BE with an adjective-like -ing word that is an adjective rather than participle, such as interesting. Words like interesting after BE in a sentence like (f) would be a “complement” of BE rather than forming a verb tense with it (see 220. Features of Complements).

Gerunds after BE can only be complements, corresponding to noun / pronoun ones:

(g) Seeing is believing.

(h) The solution is eating less.

One way of deciding whether an -ing verb after BE is a participle (making a continuous tense) or a gerund (making a complement) is to see if the words the action (or the state) of are a logical addition just before: they should be only before gerunds. This happens in (g) and (h), and also in the following problematic case from the post 69. How Computers Get Grammar Wrong (2):

(i) The key to sounding formal in writing is knowing which words to avoid.

The underlined words here resemble the present continuous tense of KNOW, but they are not that because of both the normal inability of KNOW to be used in continuous tenses and the illogical meaning that would be created. The meaning is much more logical if we take is to be the ordinary non-auxiliary use of BE and knowing to be a gerund meaning “the state of knowing”. 

Participles and gerunds after a verb are often in the “object” position. Participles always need a nearby noun (or equivalent); gerunds sometimes have one and sometimes do not. Consider this:

(j) The plan involves trains.

The presence of the object noun trains here means a participle can accompany it. Expressing the idea of “which” + verb, a participle would be understood as classifying trains but not naming a train action involved in the plan. A lone participle, e.g. speeding, would have to go before trains, while one with its own object or adverb, e.g. speeding at 200 km/h, would go after (see 109. Placing an Adjective after its Noun).

On the other hand, if speeding is a gerund, it will mean “speeding by trains” rather than “trains which are speeding”, and it will indicate what the plan involves. This use of speeding could simply replace trains in (j), but it could also accompany it, positioned after regardless of whether or not there is a following object or adverb.

These requirements mean that the usage of the participle and the gerund is the same when they follow an object noun along with their own object or adverb (…trains speeding at 200 km/h), so that there can be uncertainty about the intended meaning (see 257. Structures with a Double Meaning 4, #2).

A problem with expressing the gerund meaning in the object position is that a gerund is not the only possibility. Common alternatives are the to (infinitive) form of a verb and ordinary tense forms after conjunctions like that or whether. The correct choice usually depends on what the main verb is. For some common verbs that need or allow a following -ing, see 232. Verbs with an Object + “-ing”. For examples of verbs followed by that, see 153. Conjunction Uses of “that”; for verbs followed by to, see 208. Verbs with an Object + Infinitive.

One other late-sentence use of participles is at the end but describing the subject:

(k) The new trains will make a huge difference travelling at over 200 km/h.

 In addition to describing a much earlier noun, delayed participles like this often suggest the idea of “how” (as here) or “while” or “and” (see 101. Add-On Participles).

.

PRACTICE EXERCISE

Nouns described by an –ing word before them are very common in English. Many combinations of this type, indeed, have evolved into “fixed” phrases (see 320. Special Participle Uses, #7). In the following task, see how easily you can tell whether each -ing word is a gerund or a participle (answers below).

1. a walking stick
2. thinking time
3. a defining moment
4. a compelling reason
5. meeting rooms
6. taxing work
7. an opening ceremony
8. pressing matters
9. a sticking point
10. a living wage
11. a helping hand
12. passing ability

.

Answers

1. GERUND: a stick for walking; 2. GERUND: time for thinking; 3. PARTICIPLE: a moment that defines; 4. PARTICIPLE: a reason that compels … (…action to be taken); 5. GERUND: rooms for holding meetings; 6. PARTICIPLE: work that taxes (= demands energy); 7. PARTICIPLE: a ceremony that opens; 8. PARTICIPLE: matters that press (for attention); 9. GERUND: a point where things may get stuck; 10. GERUND: a wage for staying alive; 11. PARTICIPLE: a hand that helps; 12. GERUND: ability in passing (a ball to another player)

70. Gerunds

.

Gerund Roles

Gerunds are “-ing” verbs used like nouns, though their grammar is not completely noun-like.

THE FORM & USE OF GERUNDS

Verbs ending with -ing, familiar partners of BE within “continuous” verb tense forms (are thinking, will be receiving etc.), can be used without BE in both adjective and noun positions. Some become true adjectives or nouns, losing all of their verbal features, while others merely become adjective-like or noun-like, retaining some verb properties.

This post is about the last of these possibilities: -ing verbs with noun-like uses. These are the main subgroup of what are commonly called “gerunds” or “verbal nouns” (the others – not considered here – are noun-like having or being + “past” participle, respectively considered in 267. Participles and Gerunds with “Having” and 291. Subtleties of “-ed”, #5). I wish to highlight first the noun-like features of -ing gerunds and then the verb-like ones.

For information about adjective-like -ing verbs, see 52. Participles Placed Just After their Noun. For information about true -ing adjectives and nouns, see 245. Adjectives with a Participle Ending and 240. Nouns that End with “-ing”. For extensive comparison of gerunds and participles, see 71. Gerund and Participle Uses of “-ing”.

.

SIMILARITIES BETWEEN GERUNDS AND NOUNS

There are two major noun features that gerunds share: sentence positions and ability to have an article (a/the).

Gerunds in Noun Positions

Gerunds can occupy the following noun positions:

1. Subject/ Object/ Complement of a Verb

These noun roles are defined respectively in this blog in 12. Singular and Plural Verb Choices8. Object-Dropping Errors and 220. Features of Complements. Gerunds in the subject and object roles are illustrated in the following:

(a) Paraphrasing involves comprehending the source text.

The gerund paraphrasing here is the subject of the main verb involves, and the gerund comprehending is its object (the words after the latter are its own object, illustrating how gerunds still resemble verbs when in noun positions).

These gerund uses are a result of a general rule that verbs need special partner language to occupy a noun position. The problem is that -ing is not always the right kind: sometimes that (+ ordinary verb form) is necessary instead, sometimes the infinitive verb form (with to), and sometimes an “action” noun (see 131. Uses of “Action” Nouns).

Alternatives to a gerund are more likely in the object position than the subject one. That is common after a speech or thought verb like ARGUE or BELIEVE (see 153. Conjunction Uses of “that”). To is typical with verb objects of various other verb types, such as those expressing “hoping”, “seeming”, “commanding” and “causing” (see 302. Verbs with a Partner Infinitive and 208. Verbs with an Object + Infinitive).

A clear situation where a verb in the object position must be a gerund is when the main verb contains a preposition, as in LOOK FORWARD TO or DEAL WITH (see 44. Troublesome Prepositional Verbs). Elsewhere, gerunds are found in the object position after a seemingly random set of verbs, including AVOID, ENJOY, FACILITATE, RISK and INVOLVE. Some of these need or allow a noun before the gerund, and some do not (see 321. Types of “-ing” Verb after a Verb, #1-#3).

Gerunds can only sometimes be a complement: they must be “subject” complements (placed directly after a link verb like BE), not “object” ones (following and describing the object of certain verbs, such as IMAGINE: see 220. Features of Complements, #1). As subject complements, they need to be distinguished from -ing participles helping to form “continuous” verb tenses (see 69. How Computers Get Grammar Wrong 2).

A verb in the subject complement position can only be a gerund if the subject of the sentence is a particular kind of noun. Ruled out are speech and thought nouns like idea – verbs in the complement position after these mostly need that, to or a preposition (see 287. Speech and Thought Nouns). Also ruled out are certain nouns, such as purpose, that require any verb used as their complement to have to (see 119. BE Before a “to” Verb).

Subject nouns that usually need or allow the gerund form of any verb used as their complement often represent a positive or negative quality, e.g. advantage, benefit, enjoyment, success, value, disadvantage, danger, difficulty and problem. (see 277. Advantages and Disadvantages, #4). In addition, gerund complements may follow a starting gerund, as in seeing is believing, though sometimes an “action” noun is preferable.

.

2. After a Preposition

A noun that is not a subject or object or complement is likely to follow a preposition. Prepositions, indeed, are definable by their need for an accompanying noun (see 84. Seven Things to Know About Prepositions, #1). To place a verb after a preposition, the ordinary form is again ruled out: some must follow the fact that (see 153. Conjunction Uses of “that“), but many need the gerund form:

(b) A syringe is used for injecting (of) fluids into living tissue.

Some preposition uses are more likely than others to have a following verb (and hence gerund). One is for expressing a purpose, as above (a word that is easy to misuse – see 60. Purpose Sentences with “For”); another is by introducing a process (see 73. Prepositions for Saying How and 101. Add-On Participles).

A preposition use after which gerunds and ordinary nouns seem equally likely is the kind associated with particular preceding adjectives or nouns. For example, interested in… can combine as well with the verb travelling as with the noun books; prone to… might be found with a noun like illness or a verb like overeating; barriers to… might accompany progress or socialising. When the preposition is to, care is needed not to confuse it with the to of infinitive verbs (see 35. Words Followed by “to -ing”).

One preposition that sometimes needs a following to verb rather than gerund is except (see 215. Naming Exceptions).

.

3. Before a Noun

The ability of a noun to be used like an adjective before another noun is extensively discussed in these pages in 38. Nouns Used Like Adjectives,  58. Optional Apostrophe Endings and 136. Types of Description by Nouns. Gerunds readily act in the same way, e.g. a walking stick, a driving lesson, and opening times. Care must be taken, though, not to mix this use up with use #1 above. Consider the combination eating apples in this sentence:

(c) Eating apples makes a major difference.

Does this gerund eating have apples as its object, so that it is itself the subject of makes, creating the meaning “the eating of apples”, or does it describe apples, so that apples is the subject and the meaning is “apples for eating”?

The singular form of makes shows that the first of these – eating with an object – is the right interpretation. Unfortunately, this verb-form test helps only when the noun after the gerund is plural; when it is uncountable (as in cooking chocolate), both meanings are possible (see 124. Structures with a Double Meaning, #1). One other test for deciding whether or not a gerund is adjectival is to see if the or a(n) is grammatically possible between it and the following noun: if it is, the gerund is not adjectival but has the noun as its object.

.

ARTICLE USE WITH GERUNDS

Ability to go alone after the is a strong sign that a word is a noun (though not definitive – see 6. Adjectives with No Noun 1). Gerunds have this ability. Paraphrasing in sentence (a) above would with the mean previously-identified paraphrasing rather than the idea in general. Other words like thea, this, their, no (see 110. Nouns without “the” or “a”) – are also usable.

One situation where gerunds cannot have the, however, is when there is an object noun after them:

(d) Signing the treaty took place at 11.00 a.m.

This restriction can be overcome, though, by adding of before the object (the signing of the treaty: see below). With a following preposition, gerunds are always usable either with or without the

Possessive adjectives appear to be the only kind of word like the that remain possible without a later preposition. However, I feel the meaning changes slightly: their signing of the treaty means “the act of their signing” but without of means “the fact that they signed”.

In the object position, a possessive is often an alternative to a simple pronoun or noun

(e) The courage of Mandela led to him/his being imprisoned.

For more on possessives before gerunds, see 232. Verbs with an Object + “-ing”, #4.

.

SIMILARITIES BETWEEN GERUNDS AND VERBS

Gerunds can be recognised as verb-like not just from their meaning and appearance, but also from some of the grammar rules that apply to them. Most obviously, they can have subjects and objects of their own. The following points are also important.

1. Ability of an Object to be Directly after

Elsewhere within this blog (31. Prepositions after Action Nouns 1), it is shown how some nouns can have an object just like verbs, but only by adding a preposition (usually of). Examples are (the) removal of rubbish and (the) discovery of Neptune.

As indicated above, gerunds are usable like nouns in this way – (the) signing of the treaty – but they are also usable in a more verb-like way, with no preposition and no preceding the (e.g. signing the treaty). The two uses are often interchangeable, but easily confused (see 303. Confusions of Similar Structures 4, #1).

.

2. Combination with Adverbs

A major difference between nouns and verbs is in the kinds of “describing” word that they allow: adjectives with nouns and adverbs with verbs. Thus, the noun knowledge needs to be described by the adjective good, while the verb know requires the adverb well. Gerunds can have either an adjective or an adverb, depending respectively on whether or not there is a preposition after them. Compare:

(f) (ADJ + of) The morning was taken up by (the) solemn signing of the treaty.

(g) (ADV) The morning was taken up by solemnly signing the treaty.

A free choice between these two possibilities is not always possible: the adjective use seems more common, especially at the start of a sentence.

.

PRACTICE EXERCISE (GERUNDS)

Readers are invited to try the following exercise, which offers practice in using gerunds appropriately. There are four jumbled sentences to make sense of (answers at the end).

.

1. expensive work is by to and travelling stressful car.

2. the a a dictionary language of learning using foreign facilitates.

3. without effectively skills practising cannot writing regularly develop.

4. being oven some by be very sterilized powders hot a placed can in.

.

Answers

1. Travelling to work by car is stressful and expensive (or … expensive and stressful).

2. Using a dictionary facilitates the learning of a foreign language.

3. Writing skills cannot develop effectively without practising regularly.

4. Some powders can be sterilized by being placed in a very hot oven.