101. Add-On Participles

Add-On

Sentences can be expanded by adding on a participle and its dependent words at the end

.

DEFINITION OF ADD-ON PARTICIPLES

Participles are verbs in a particular form that can be used like an adjective (see 52. Participles Placed Just After their Noun). They can be used in sentences in at least five different ways (see 75. How to Avoid “Dangling” Participles). In this post I wish to examine one of these ways:

(a) The disease spread widely, inflicting much suffering.

Here the participle inflicting adds a new statement onto the end of an existing one. In addition, the noun that the participle describes (disease) comes well before it, and is the subject of another verb placed in between (spread).

These are the key features of what I call “add-on” participles. They are similar to those of “add-on” adjectives (see 159. Exotic Grammar Structures 2, #3). Note that being near the end of a sentence is not in itself enough. The following participles are not add-on, since they describe the wrong noun:

(b) A poor diet can leave a child struggling at school.

(c) The labourers left the fields, their work completed.

In (b), the participle struggling describes the object of the main verb (a child) rather than its subject. It is, in fact, an “object complement” (see 92. Complement-Showing “As”). In (c), the noun described by the participle completed (work) is a new one placed directly before it instead of one already used before the main verb. In the next example, the right noun is described but the participle is still not add-on:

(d) The debate about consciousness remains perplexing.

Here perplexing is a complement of the subject debate. In other words, it not only describes this noun, but is helped to do so by the main verb remains (see 92. Complement-Showing “As”). Add-on participles do not need the main verb like this.

If an add-on participle and its dependent words are left out, a possible sentence will still remain. A preceding comma, as in (a), seems quite common, but is not always present:

(e)  Trains are likely to be delayed passing through the Midlands.

In this post I wish to examine the meanings that add-on participles can express, to offer some advice on the use of a preceding comma, and to explain how these participles differ from -ing words after by.

.

USES OF ADD-ON PARTICIPLES

The following examples illustrate different uses of add-on participles:

(a) The disease spread widely, inflicting much suffering.

(e) Trains are likely to be delayed passing through the Midlands.

(f) The disease spread widely, transported by people’s clothing.

(g) The king died, leaving no successor.

(h) The king died, throwing the country into confusion.

The differences might be described as follows:

In (a) two extended events happen together. The first is hinted to be a cause of the second. Before the participle, one could add in the process (see 81. Tricky Word Contrasts 2). The participle seems more likely to be “present” (with -ing) than “past” (with -ed or irregular equivalent).

In (e) the participle event is likely to take more time than the main one. Before the participle (which seems likely to end in -ing), one could add when.

In (f) the event expressed by the participle clarifies how the main event happens. Both -ing and -ed participles seem equally possible (an -ing alternative to transported by could be travelling on).

In (g) two instantaneous events happen together. Both -ing and -ed participles seem equally possible (an -ed alternative to leaving no could be deprived of a).

In (h) the participle event is a result of the main one. Unlike in (a), it happens after the completion of the main event. Before the participle, one could add thus.  The participle seems likely to end in ing. More about this usage is in the post 32. Expressing Consequences.

.

PUNCTUATION BEFORE ADD-ON PARTICIPLES

The example sentences above show that a comma is almost normal before an add-on participle. Only sentences like (e), where the add-on participle can be paraphrased with a when statement, seem exceptional. However, sentences like (f), which use the participle to say how something happens, might also sometimes lack a comma, like this:

(i) The pilgrims stand praying in the square.

I would suggest that the main difference made by a comma in sentences like (f) and (i) is the amount of focus given to each half. In (f), the half with the main verb and the one with the participle have equal focus – the sentence is communicating two equally-important messages. In (i), however, the absent comma places the focus more on the participle half, the idea of praying. The fact that the pilgrims are standing is not at all what the sentence is trying to communicate.

In (i) the participle part is like a verb-describing adverb, linking closely with the verb stand. It may be relevant that in (f) the participle is separated from the main verb by the adverb widely, since this could be preventing it from being closely linked with the main verb. For more on the way focus can determine grammatical choices, see 156. Mentioning What the Reader Knows Already.
.

ADD-ON “-ing” PARTICIPLES COMPARED TO “by -ing”

Add-on participles like praying in (i) are not the only -ing form that can express the idea of “how”; -ing verbs placed after by do the same (see 73. Ways of Saying How). They are gerunds rather than participles (see 71. Gerund and Participle Uses of “-ing”) but is their meaning different? Compare these two modifications of sentence (f):

(j) The virus spread widely, travelling on people’s clothes.

(k) The virus spread widely by travelling on people’s clothes.

I think that two kinds of “how” are involved here. The one without by, the participle use, involves an action accompanying the main verb action (spread) that cannot be confirmed as its cause. The one with by, on the other hand, is an action happening before the main verb action, and definitely causing it to happen. The same idea of accompanying without enabling the main verb action is also present in the other “how” usage above, in (i).

These two types of “how” – accompanying and causing an action – probably correspond to the two types that mainstream grammars commonly call “manner” and “means”. The second is very typically associated with the preposition by (see 73. Ways of Saying How). The first can be shown by various possibilities, of which add-on participles seem to be one.

Manner actions are most commonly expressed with an adverb (e.g. enthusiastically), or a preposition phrase (with enthusiasm – see 85. Preposition Phrases and Corresponding Adverbs). They are identifiable not just from their inability to be expressed with by, but also from an ability to be paraphrased using the words in a(n) … way. This ability is especially clear in (i), where praying is easily seen to mean “in a praying way” (and certainly is not replaceable with by praying), but is also arguably present in (j), the meaning being “in a clothes-travelling way”.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.