105. Questions with a “to” Verb

Question of Trust

A question word with a “to” verb expresses a special meaning and is quite common in formal writing

THE OCCURRENCE OF QUESTIONS WITH A “to” VERB

As the cartoon above shows, questions can be asked with just a question word and a verb with to. This is rather different from the standard question structure that most learners of English encounter first, where the verb after the question word must have a subject. Even indirect questions can be written with a to verb, their indirect status being clear from clues outside them, such as the absence of a question mark (see 57. Indirect Questions in Formal Writing) rather than their own form:

(a) Nurses must learn how to avoid infection.

Most questions with a to verb can also be phrased without one in the normal way. For example, the indirect one above can be rewritten …how they can avoid infection, and the one in the cartoon means Who can I trust?

On the other hand, many questions without a to verb cannot be rephrased with one. This is true, for example, of the following:

(b) Who lives in the Arctic Circle?

The first matter that I wish to investigate in this post is what kind of question can be asked with a to verb. A further question is where questions with a to verb are likely to be found, assuming one is possible.

.

QUESTIONS THAT CAN BE ASKED WITH A “to” VERB

Direct questions seem less generally usable with a to verb than indirect ones. Those where a to verb is possible seem mainly to be not information-seeking but indicating the speaker’s inability to find an answer. In the cartoon above, for example, the speaker is expressing an inability to identify trustworthy people, thereby implying that none exist. As another example, Where to go? would indicate uncertainty about a destination.

Indirect questions, by contrast, often allow a to verb where a direct one would not. This is the case, for example, with the common information-seeking question quoted by a reader in the comment section after this post:

(c) Can you tell me how to say X in English?

One major characteristic of all questions with a to verb is that they typically begin with a question word. However, there are exceptions, and there are some question words that cannot make a to question.

The major type of question that is ruled out as makeable with a to verb because it lacks a starting question word is direct yes/no questions – the kind that start with a verb rather than a question word – like this:

(d) Should we resign our membership?

On the other hand, indirect yes/no questions, which typically begin with the question word whether or if, are able to be made with a to verb, provided they have whether rather than if (e.g. wondered whether to... – see 99. Meanings of “whether…or…”).

The main kind of question without a question word that can be made with to paraphrases the question word with a noun. It can only be indirect (see 285. Complexities of Question Words, #2). Every question word has at least one corresponding noun. For example, who corresponds to person, why to reason and how to way (see 185. Noun Synonyms of Question Words). Thus, the indirect question how to avoid in sentence (a) above could be paraphrased as the way to avoid.

Four mainstream question words that are sometimes grammatically unable to be used in a to question are what, which, who and whose. They can accompany a to verb only when making all or part of the object of the verb after them, like who in the cartoon above. When they are the subject, like who before lives in sentence (b) above, the question must be of the standard kind.

A second major characteristic of questions with a to verb is that the corresponding ordinary-form question is likely to be one with can or should. The question in the cartoon implies either of these; the question in sentence (a) suggests can; indirect to questions with whether usually seem to imply should, as does the following:

(e) Nervousness can make a speaker forget what to say (= what s/he should say).

Another special implication of questions with a to verb is who that verb’s subject is. The implied subject of trust in the question in the cartoon is I, that of avoid in (a) is nurses, and that of say in (e) is a speaker. In general, direct questions with to must usually imply either I, we, one or you (= “one”); while indirect ones must usually imply either one or the same subject as that of the verb accompanying them (indirect questions nearly always having an accompanying verb – see 219. Wording next to Indirect Questions).

Here is an indirect question whose to verb implies the subject one, meaning “people in general”:

(f) Customers ask how to prevent leakage (= how one can prevent leakage).

The implication of the subject nurses in (a) and a speaker in (d) shows how a to verb in an indirect question can have the same implied subject as that of the verb outside the question.

If the subject of the verb in an indirect question is not either one or a repetition of the subject of the external verb, the question cannot usually be asked with to. This is the case in the following examples (subjects underlined):

(g) The question IS how spaceships CAN REACH the stars.

(h) Researchers WONDER what governments CAN DO about global warming.

.

OTHER FEATURES OF “to” QUESTIONS

Questions introduced by why, both direct and indirect, can be asked with a to verb, but they must drop the to! For example, one must say why work hard(?) rather than *why to work hard(?) (see 148. Infinitive Verbs without “to”, #5 and 274. Questions with a Hidden Meaning, #3).

Indirect to questions generally behave in the same way as ordinary indirect questions. Their ability to replace the question word with a noun has already been mentioned. Further examples are:

(i) Caesar understood the way (= HOW) to defeat his enemies.

(j) One must establish the distance (= HOW FAR) to travel in a day.

Note, however, that reason, the noun for why, allows a choice about putting its following verb into the to form:

(k) This essay will investigate reasons for providing (to provide) health care.

Another similarity that indirect to questions share with ordinary indirect questions is their ability to have a preposition with the question word, either before or after (see 285. Complexities of Question Words, #6):

(l) Columbus was unsure by which route to return (… which route to return by).

(m) The people no longer knew in whom to place their trust (… who to place their trust in).

.

“to” QUESTIONS IN FORMAL WRITING

In formal writing, it is quite acceptable, when a question can be asked with a to verb, to use one. One of the benefits is conciseness, since to questions need fewer words than their alternative. Indirect to questions will normally be more common than direct ones because formal writing is a context where the meaning of the latter is rarely appropriate.

The main formal uses of indirect to questions will be the same as those of ordinary indirect questions: reporting, topic-introducing or ignorance-asserting (see 127. When to Use Indirect Speech). Here is an example of the reporting use in academic writing:

(n) Smith (2014, p. 39) wonders which factor to investigate first.

To questions with a topic-introducing purpose seem especially common in official information leaflets. One reason may be that this kind of writing is often advice-giving, where many of the verbs include the meaning of can or should just as to questions do (see 187. Advising and Recommending). Using to instead of can or should is perhaps preferred because it is more friendly-sounding (see 166. Appropriacy in Professional English).

Within information leaflets, topic-introducing to questions are very likely to appear as section headings – replacing a noun that is more typical of headings elsewhere (see 178. How to Write a Heading). Common examples are Where to Go, What to Do Next and How to Apply. Such headings tend to be indirect to questions, with no question mark after them.

104. Naming Data Sources with “As”

.

graph

“As” can introduce the name of a data source, but the wording after it is sometimes tricky

DATA SOURCES IN PROFESSIONAL WRITING

A data source is my name for text-based data that the same text somewhere else verbally repeats, summarises, describes or interprets. Data sources are of many kinds: verbal messages (in sentence, paragraph or chapter form), maps, pictures, graphs, diagrams, numbers in a table, etc. Verbal messages are not a common data source because they do not have to be repeated etc. and there is rarely a good reason for doing so. However, non-verbal information must normally receive such treatment, so is nearly always a data source (see 115. Surveying Numerical Data).

When a data source is written about for the first time, its description or name is normally included in the opening sentence. The purpose is not always just to tell the reader what is being discussed: with non-verbal data there is also the message that now is the time to look at it before continuing reading. A description of a data source typically mentions its type and location, e.g. the previous chapter, the table below or the adjacent map. On the other hand, names, which are perhaps more common and professional-sounding, tend to number the data source in expressions like chapter 2 or Table 1 or Fig(ure) A.

There are different ways of including the description or name of a data source at the start of a discussion about it. Here are three common ones:

(a) Child trafficking IS INCREASING alarmingly (Graph 2).

(b) Total honesty IS impossible (see below).

(c) Figure 4 indicates that demand REMAINS constant.

The first of these simply names the data source in brackets at the end of a sentence about it. It resembles academic referencing (which is used when data originates in a different text, and is described in detail in this blog in 76. Tenses of Citation Verbs).

The naming in (b) is similar, except that only the location of the data source is given, preceded by the invitational imperative verb see (see 128 Imperative Verbs in Formal Writing, #4). I think such a verb cannot be used when the data source is visible nearby, but is compulsory otherwise.

In (c), on the other hand, a name of a data source starts a sentence about it as the subject of the main verb. This verb is similar to those commonly found with indirect speech, expressing the idea of “saying” or “showing” (see 150. Verb Choices with Reported Speech). Here it is followed by that plus a statement containing another verb (remains), but a simple summarising noun object, such as demand data, is also possible.

One other common way of naming or describing a data source is with the conjunction as (rather like its use for referencing written sources). However, as cannot be used in all situations, and it has to be used in particular ways. These requirements are the focus of the present post. For other uses of as, see 53. “As”, “Like” and “Such As”92. Verbs with an Object + “As”183. Statements between Commas225. Simultaneous Occurrence and 279. Grammatical Variability of Citation Verbs.

.

SITUATIONS THAT DO NOT ALLOW “AS”

All of the example sentences above can be rewritten with as. Here is (b) in this form:

(d) As is shown below, total honesty is impossible.

On the other hand, there are sentences that cannot also have as:

(e) The main development theories are shown in Table 1.

(f) Figure 4 shows how demand has gradually fallen.

What prevents the use of as in (e) is the lack of a verb in the description of the data source’s content (underlined). Sentences (a), (b) and (c) all have a verb there (capitalised).

What prevents the use of as in (f) is the use there of how instead of that. A visible or understood that after a verb of saying or showing introduces a factual statement that is the primary focus, whereas how pushes the fact into the background (because it is considered obvious), shifting attention to how it comes about (see 271. Tricky Grammar Contrasts 3, #5). As cannot introduce the idea of “how”.

.

FEATURES OF “AS” + DATA SOURCE

This use of as generally requires surrounding punctuation, typically two commas or a comma and a full stop, but sometimes two brackets or dashes (see 214. Parentheses, #2). It also implies the writer’s agreement with the information it is presenting (see 152. Agreeing and Disagreeing in Formal Contexts). This may explain why it is common before data sources, since data is hard to disagree with!

A grammar rule that applies to any parenthetical use of as is that it cannot combine with a later that. For more details, see 133. Confusions of Similar Structures 1, #4.

Other rules involve the verb that follows as and a data source name. There are two main groups of such verbs: those representing reader actions in relation to the data (e.g. SEE), and those representing actions of the writer and/or the data itself (e.g. SHOW).

A problem with reader verbs is that their natural subject is the personal pronoun you, a kind of word that is often considered inappropriate in formal writing (see 46. How to Avoid “I”, “We” and “You”). To overcome this problem, an obvious strategy is to put reader verbs into the passive voice after as:

(g) As will be recognised from Table 2, unemployment rates vary greatly.

It is usually necessary for a passive reader verb to include will like this (or may or can) and not to have a subject. This second feature is particularly surprising, since verbs nearly always need a subject unless they are participles or infinitives. I suspect that many other languages would indeed have a noun or pronoun between a word like as and a passive reader verb: students learning English certainly tend to add the pronoun it. One other noticeable feature about (g) is the preposition after the passive verb: from. There might be a possibility of using in instead, but from is very common.

Note that although it is common to express the reader’s perspective with a passive verb, this form can also be avoided, just as passives in general often can (see 27. How to Avoid Passive Verbs). A typical alternative is BE + adjective, e.g. as is obvious from…. Again the verb has no subject. Other common adjectives are clear, evident, implicit (+ in), noticeable, observable, recognizable and visible.

Writer verbs allow a little more flexibility, as they can be used after as in the active voice without needing an undesirable pronoun. The subject of an active verb will instead be the data source itself, like in (c) above. The uses with the active and passive voice might look like this:

(h) As Figure 4 indicates, average automobile sizes have increased considerably.

(i) As (is/was/has been) mentioned in/by chapter 3, honesty is rare.

The use with a passive verb again has various noticeable features. Once more, there is no subject like it between as and the passive verb. This means that we can say in general: passive verbs after source-showing as have no subject. Secondly, there is no will or may or can in the verb, only an ordinary form of BE. Thirdly, this form of BE can be left out – something not possible with passive reader verbs (for a discussion of BE omission in general, see 192. When BE can be Omitted). Fourthly, the preposition after the verb is by or in, not from.

It may be asked why one should ever use the passive with writer verbs after as when the active is usually possible. The answer, I think, is that the active, in having the data source as its subject, can give too much prominence to it at the expense of the writer. If the writer wishes to ensure that his/her own responsibility for the point being made is absolutely clear, s/he has the choice of using either an active verb with as its subject (e.g. As I argue in Chapter 3, …) or a passive verb. Since is often felt to be inappropriate in formal writing, the passive can be the better option.

If the aim of a passive writer verb is to highlight the writer’s involvement, the correct preposition is not by, which would give the data source the same prominence as its use as the subject of an active verb, but in (As mentioned in chapter 3, …). In suggests that the data source is only something used by the unmentioned “real” subject of the corresponding active verb, helping the reader to recognize this unmentioned subject, the writer.

In grammatical terms, by introduces an “agent” – the cause of the action of the verb – whereas in introduces a tool or “instrument”. A more common preposition before an instrument is with, but in often replaces it with container-like instruments (see 73. Prepositions for Saying How). Even on is sometimes found in data discussions, for example when the data source is a map (see 111. Words with a Typical Preposition).

Finally, there is a special value to be noted of as phrases highlighting previous statements, like as mentioned above: they prevent the reader from deeming the text unduly repetitive. In other words, they turn “bad” repetition into “good” (see 24. Good and Bad Repetition), showing the writer’s awareness of the previous mention. Other verbs that could be used include argued, explained and stated.

.

PRACTICE EXERCISE: READER AND WRITER VERBS

It can be a useful vocabulary exercise to work with a list of reader and writer verbs. Here is such a list. Which verbs are which kind? The answers are given in two subsequent lists.

Reader/Writer Verbs

ACKNOWLEDGE, APPRECIATE, CONCLUDE, DEDUCE, DEMONSTRATE, DETERMINE, DISCOVER, FIND, ILLUSTRATE, IMPLY, INDICATE, INFER, LIST, MAKE CLEAR, NOTE, NOTICE, OBSERVE, PORTRAY, PRESENT, PROVE, REALISE, RECOGNISE, REPRESENT, SEE, SET OUT, SHOW, STATE, SUGGEST, SUMMARISE, UNDERSTAND.

.

Reader Verbs

ACKNOWLEDGE, APPRECIATE, ASCERTAIN, CONCLUDE, DEDUCE, DETERMINE, DISCOVER, FIND, INFER, NOTE, NOTICE, OBSERVE, REALISE, RECOGNISE, SEE, UNDERSTAND.

.

Writer Verbs

DEMONSTRATE, ILLUSTRATE, IMPLY, INDICATE, LIST, MAKE CLEAR, PORTRAY, PRESENT, PROVE, REPRESENT, SET OUT, SHOW, STATE, SUGGEST, SUMMARISE.