205. Paraphrasing Prepositions with Words of Other Kinds

.

A significant number of paraphrase possibilities are alternatives to a preposition

REASONS FOR PARAPHRASING PREPOSITIONS

The skill of paraphrase – being able to say the same thing in different ways – is not often given the recognition it deserves. It is valuable not just for reporting other writers’ ideas (see 76. Tenses of Citation Verbs), but also for facilitating aspects of one’s own writing, such as conciseness (see 265. Grammar Tools for Better Writing), repetition (see 286. Repeating in Different Words), and avoidance of unknown and undesirable wording (see 202. Some Strategies for Learning English, Practice Strategy #2). In fact, for many people the very act of writing probably involves constant paraphrase.

A Guinlist post on paraphrase techniques (80. How to Paraphrase) distinguishes two basic types, depending on the size of the text in question. Paraphrase of longer texts tends to happen more automatically, provided they are approached in the right way. Shorter texts present more of a challenge because we are more conscious of their wording when we are looking to paraphrase them. The advice that the post gives regarding shorter texts is to avoid synonym-substitution, and to look instead for new words that are grammatically different. Reordering the meanings in a sentence is suggested to be a particularly effective means of achieving this objective.

However, a problem with this approach, useful as it is, is that it assumes a fairly strong command of English grammar and vocabulary. I can imagine that some writers who have not grown up using English will sometimes find, after thinking of a new way to say something, that it requires linguistic knowledge that they lack. Making an impact on this problem is not an easy task, given the vastness of English grammar and vocabulary. However, it is what I am attempting in the present post, in the belief that ways of paraphrasing prepositions bring together under one heading quite a wide range of English usage. For a similar study of adjectives, see 270. Paraphrasing Adjectives.

.

PREPOSITION REPLACEMENT WITH A VERB

Prepositions are usable in various ways: some express their own meaning, some belong to a particular grammatical structure, and some result from the choice of another word (see 111. Words with a Typical Preposition). Verbs are particularly able to paraphrase the first kind. Consider this:

(a) The Harbour Bridge goes over/across Sydney Harbour.

The same meaning is conveyed by replacing the underlined words with the verb crosses or spans. These verbs replace a preposition combined with another verb (often GO or BE). However, directly after a noun their participle -ing form may replace a preposition alone (see 320. Special Participle Uses, #1). For example, the bridge across = the bridge spanning (see 295. Options in Saying Where, #2), animals except dogs = animals excepting dogs (see 215. Naming Exceptions), and life without excitement = life lacking excitement.

Here are some common equivalences:

GO INTO = ENTER; PENETRATE
GO ALONG = PARALLEL
GO OUT OF = LEAVE; EXIT
GO PAST = OVERTAKE
GO THROUGH = PIERCE; TRANSIT
GO TOWARDS = APPROACH
LIVE IN = INHABIT
BE AROUND = SURROUND
BE/COME AFTER = FOLLOW

BE/COME BEFORE = PRECEDE
BE BESIDE = FLANK
BE/GO BETWEEN = CONNECT; LINK; SEPARATE
BE LIKE = RESEMBLE
BE NEXT TO = ADJOIN
BE IN = FILL; BELONG TO
BE ON = OCCUPY
BE/GO WITH = ACCOMPANY
BE WITHOUT = LACK

Note how the verb-preposition combinations resemble prepositional verbs, where the verb and preposition are more closely linked together (see 84. Seven Things to Know about Prepositions, #6). Prepositional verbs too can be paraphrased without the preposition, usually for greater formality. Common examples are:

GO INTO = INVESTIGATE
ASK FOR = REQUEST
DEAL WITH = MANAGE
LOOK FOR = SEEK
REFER TO = CONSULT
THINK ABOUT = CONSIDER

For more, see 108. Formal and Informal Words.

Other verbs are able to paraphrase some of the more grammatical uses of prepositions. Consider this:

(b) Oxygen is collected in/by a gas jar.

With passive verbs like is collected, a noun after by represents what would be the subject of the verb in the active form – it would say here that a gas jar was doing the collecting – while one after in would represent a container-like tool, implying that the verb action was performed by a background human (see 73. Prepositions for Saying How).

In both cases, the preposition can be paraphrased by exchanging the verb for a new one in the active form, e.g. fills. This would attribute the action to the subject of the sentence (oxygen), but most readers would nevertheless recognise that this is just a convention of English to play down human involvement, and would hence reach the correct interpretation.

Paraphrasing a grammatical word like by after passive verbs with a non-grammatical word like fills is surprisingly often possible in English (see 298. Grammar Meanings without Grammar). Of course, it enables not just by to be removed but also a possibly undesirable passive verb (see 27. How to Avoid Passive Verbs).

Giving non-living things metaphorical responsibility for an action seems a common way to avoid prepositions. How could the following be reworded?

(c) In London, the weather is frequently cloudy.

Again, the noun after the preposition can become a main part of the sentence: London has frequent cloudy weather. The link shown here between is in and has is often useful – see 161. Special Uses of “There” Sentences, #7. Care is needed, however, to avoid the hybrid *In London has… (see 84. Seven Things to Know about Prepositions, #5).

To take one final example, purpose-naming is for -ing (see 60. Purpose Sentences with “For) can be replaced by just the ordinary form of the -ing verb:

(d) The PRT SC key photographs (= is for photographing) the screen.

.

REPLACEMENT WITH A CONJUNCTION

Conjunctions resemble prepositions in the grammatical structures they help to form, in the kinds of meaning that they have, and sometimes even in their spellings. The main difference is that prepositions must be followed just by a noun or noun equivalent while conjunctions usually need at least a full verb with its subject. Thus, to paraphrase a preposition with a conjunction, one usually needs to add such a verb. Consider this:

(e) Jets are especially noisy during take-off.

A conjunction that means virtually the same as the preposition during is while (see 225. Simultaneous Occurrence). One could use it by replacing the noun take-off with the verb TAKE OFF: …while they are taking off.

Not all prepositions are as easily paraphrased with a conjunction. Here are some other more obvious ones. Details of the highlighted ones can be accessed by clicking on the links.

according to – as
at/on – when/if
because of/ due to/ out of – as/because/since
besides/ along with – and
despite – although
in case of – in case
instead of – rather than/ sooner than
(+ “bare” infinitive)
in the event of – if
like – just as
with – while/if

In addition, there are some spellings usable as both a preposition and a conjunction. The main ones are after, as, before, since and until (see 174. Eight Things to Know about Conjunctions, #8).

.

PAIRED NOUN PARAPHRASES

Paired nouns are two (or more) nouns placed together so that the first describes the second in an adjective-like way (see 38. Nouns Used like Adjectives). Examples are a police warning, library books and The Kolkata climate. One way of telling that the first noun is not an adjective (like, for example, clear) is by observing that that is cannot sensibly be added between the two when their order is reversed (*a warning that is police), this being a usual possibility with adjectives (a warning that is clear).

More relevant here, though, is the fact that nouns, unlike adjectives, can reverse their order if a preposition is added between them, e.g. a warning by the police. In other words, paired nouns can be paraphrased with a preposition – and this means two nouns with a preposition between them can often (though not always) be paraphrased as paired nouns.

This kind of equivalence is extensively illustrated in the Guinlist post 136. Types of Description by Nouns. The main point made there is the variety of prepositions whose meaning can be expressed by noun pairing, as the following examples indicate:

books ABOUT history = history books
the sun AT midday = the midday sun
damage BY water = water damage
tools FOR learning = learning tools
rays FROM the sun = sun rays
forces IN the market = market forces
cooking LIKE that at home = home cooking
generation OF electricity = electricity generation
a tax ON sugar = a sugar tax
books WITH a hard cover = hard-cover books

A preposition particularly associated with such combinations is of: for numerous other examples, see 160. Uses of “of”.

The fact that paired nouns cannot always paraphrase a preposition can be a problem. Sometimes the preposition is the only possibility (e.g. the time of day; a book with answers), sometimes an apostrophe construction is the only alternative (e.g. the density of iron/iron’s density – see 58. Optional Apostrophe Endings), and sometimes the noun after the preposition can become an adjective (e.g. pollution of the atmosphere / atmospheric pollution; vacancies for managers / managerial vacancies).

.

ADVERB PARAPHRASES

Preposition phrases are either adjective-like (describing a preceding noun, as in the previous section) or adverb-like (describing a verb, adjective or entire sentence). The adverb-like kind can, when made with particular types of noun, be paraphrased by a simple adverb. For example, with ease, in haste and without doubt are very similar to easily, hastily and undoubtedly. For numerous further examples, see 85. Preposition Phrases and Corresponding Adverbs.

.

PRACTICE EXERCISE: PARAPHRASING PREPOSITIONS

To assist appreciation of the above points, try paraphrasing the given sentences so that they contain no prepositions. Possible answers are given after.

1. The use of social media has exploded since the start of the century.

2. Temperatures across the world are affected by moving currents in the ocean.

3. In academic writing, one must paraphrase or quote the words of other writers.

4. A full stop must go between two verbs without a joining device.

5. The march on Rome by Caesar led to him becoming dictator.

6. A poor diet leads in general to problems with health.

7. With demand curves economists can find optimum prices of commodities.

8. A message of great urgency was sent by headquarters three hours ago.

9. With illiteracy eradicated, great benefit will be brought to the country.

.

Suggested Answers (avoided prepositions in brackets)

1. (of, since, of) Social media use has exploded since (= conjunction) the century started.

2. (across, by, in) World temperatures reflect moving ocean currents.

3. (in, of) Academic writing requires one to paraphrase or quote other writers’ words.

4. (between, without) A full stop must separate two verbs lacking (if they lack) a joining device.

5. (on, by, to) Caesar’s Rome march meant that he became (caused him to become) dictator.

6. (in, to, with) A poor diet generally brings health problems.

7. (with, of) Demand curves enable economists to find optimum commodity prices.

8. (of, by) A highly urgent message left headquarters three hours ago.

9. (with, to) If (When) illiteracy is eradicated, great benefit will embrace the country (or Eradicating illiteracy will greatly benefit the country).

204. Grammatical Agreement

.

English has three main kinds of word whose grammatical form depends on a neighbour’s

THE EXTENT OF GRAMMATICAL AGREEMENT IN ENGLISH

Agreement is one of those elementary areas of English grammar that, like commas and capital letters, many advanced learners still regularly make mistakes with. Part of the reason is probably that the concept of agreement actually covers quite a wide range of different structures. As a result, different aspects tend to be presented at different times, making it more difficult for learners to make helpful connections between them, and there are numerous places where error is likely.

Within this blog, agreement is the main topic of one other post (12. Singular and Plural Verb Choices), and is also touched on in 28. Pronoun Errors (#5) and 138. Grammar Command Test 1. However, these are not complete surveys of agreement in English. Here, I aim to provide such a survey in the hope that this will help at least some of those who still struggle with one or other of the different agreement types.

.

DEFINITION AND TYPES OF AGREEMENT

Agreement in English is a grammatical indication that two or more neighbouring words are sharing part of their meaning with each other. A familiar example is “subject-verb” agreement, where a verb has either singular or plural form depending on which of these two meanings is present in a noun or pronoun that is its subject.

Thus, the present simple form of the verb RISE with the plural subject prices has to be plural rise, but with singular the price has to be singular rises. In this case, the form of the subject also varies according to which of the two meanings is being conveyed (something that grammarians call “concord”), but in other cases only one of the two words will change their form.

Overall, there appear to be three main combination types where agreement exists. Besides verbs and their subjects, we find certain adjective-like words agreeing with a noun that usually follows them but sometimes goes before, and pronouns agreeing with nouns or their equivalents. Each of these types has some features that can be obstacles to success in reading and/or writing.

.

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

1. Subject-Verb Agreement

It can be useful to appreciate, if you do not already, that the decision whether to make a subject and verb singular or plural is complicated by the fact that the same ending -s is often involved with both, but with opposite meanings: plural with subjects, singular with verbs. Confusion is obviously possible and may explain some errors. If you believe that you sometimes confuse the two, it might be useful to develop some mnemonic to help you, such as “SSSingular on verbs”.

Without mastery of subject-verb agreement in reading, there can be a failure to recognise which of various nouns in a sentence is a subject. This point is well illustrated by the following sentence from 28. Pronoun Errors:

(a) An alloy is a mixture of elements which has metallic properties.

Here, the subject of the verb has is actually which, a pronoun representing a noun just before it. The problem is that which has two nouns before it that it might represent: alloy and elements. Matching which with the right one is vital for the definition of an alloy: elements would suggest that all of the elements in an alloy need metallic properties, whereas a mixture would suggest only the overall mixture does, non-metallic elements within it thus being possible.

Using the rule of subject-verb agreement, however, we see from the singular verb has that which must represent the singular noun mixture, not plural elements. The message is thus that alloys can contain non-metallic substances provided only that the resultant mixture is metallic. This is the actual truth: the alloy steel, for example, contains non-metallic carbon alongside the metal iron.

Subject-verb agreement rules sometimes also help show whether or not a word in a text is a verb. For example, if we see the combination price increase, we will know from the absence of an ending on increase that it must be a noun, since a verb with price as its singular subject would have to be increases. If increase is a noun, price must be a noun describing it in an adjective-like way (see 38. Nouns Used like Adjectives) – and the verb of the sentence will be somewhere else. For more on grammar in reading, see 288. Grammatical Subtleties.

In writing, success with subject-verb agreement involves recognising which words in a planned sentence are a verb and its subject, deciding whether the subject has singular or plural meaning, making sure the subject has the right form for the intended meaning, and finally ensuring that the verb does too. The most difficult step seems to be identifying the subject. For advice on this, as well as on some of the other steps, see 12. Singular and Plural Verb Choices.

.

2(a). Agreement between a Noun and Adjective-like Word Just before it

Verbs are not the only kind of word that sometimes need to reflect the meaning of an accompanying noun: a few words that typically go just before a noun also have this feature. Where both words can change their form, it is that of the noun that is decided first – again according to whether one or more than one of something is being represented – the form of the other word then being chosen to match it.

The main words whose form varies according to whether a following noun is singular or plural are this/these, that/those, another/other and much/many. We may also include a(n), which becomes plural by being absent (the so-called “zero article”). All of these words fall into the adjective-like class called “determiners” (see 110. Nouns without “the” or “a”), but they do not all behave the same. Other and the zero article, for example, can accompany uncountable nouns as well as plural ones. Singular much cannot accompany singular countable nouns. For more about that, see 234. Adjective and Pronoun Uses of “that”.

In addition, there is sometimes a special problem with this/these: despite the different spellings, their pronunciations sound the same to speakers of some other languages. This can be a particular problem if such speakers are trying to learn English in a mostly spoken environment. Hearing no difference between /ɪ/ and /i:/ might easily suggest that this and these are a non-variable form usable before both singular and plural nouns, and hence that they have the same spelling (most likely this) in writing. An incorrect use of this appears in 214. Test your Command of Grammar 2. For more on grammar errors linked to pronunciation, see 144. Words that are Often Heard Wrongly.

The plural form other can also give problems, there being a temptation for some learners of English to add -s (e.g. *others people). One reason is undoubtedly the existence in many languages of plural adjective forms. However, English makes matters worse by possessing a pronoun (as opposed to adjective) use of other whose plural does need -s (see 133. Confusions of Similar Structures 1, #2).

In addition to the variable pre-noun words listed above, there are some invariable ones that the noun must agree with. All number words including zero but excepting one need any following noun to be plural (and hence countable), and decimal numbers do too, e.g. 0.5 litres (see 67. Numbers in Spoken English, #7). The fairly common error of using a singular noun after a number word is at least partly a result of the plurality being already clear from the number word’s meaning, though mother tongue influence can also be a factor (see 298. Grammar Meanings without Grammar, #2).

Alongside number words, substitutes like all, both, no, numerous, several, some and (a) few also need a following countable noun to be plural (though all, no and some can have a singular noun too if it is uncountable, e.g. all information). Further care is needed with each and every, which cannot ever have a plural noun, despite their meaning similarity to all (see 169. “All”, “Each” and “Every”).

.

2(b). Agreement between a Noun and an Adjective-like Word before Another Noun

This agreement combination only involves the possessives my, our, your, its, his, her, their and one’s. They always precede a noun, but not the one they agree with:

(b) Caesar overcame his enemies by force.

Here, his agrees with Caesar, not enemies: it is singular not plural (which would be their). There is actually another type of agreement here too: his tells us that Caesar was a man, not a woman – a female subject like Cleopatra would of course equate to her, and a non-living one like the state would need its. This “gender” agreement is only necessary when the noun being agreed with is singular and not the speaker or addressee. Elsewhere it is lost – there is no gender information in my, our, your, their or one’s.

The fact that possessive adjectives agree with a different noun than the one after them is for some English learners a very likely cause of error. Another is the possessive needed to agree with an earlier use of one meaning “people in general”. The correct form is always one’s, not his, her or their, e.g.:

(c) One should always back up one’s important computer files.

Note, though, that one might elsewhere mean “an individual within a particular group”, and then does need his, her or their instead of one’s (see 211. General Words for People).

.

3. Agreement between a Noun and a Pronoun

Some pronouns, e.g. all, someone, enough and more, always have the same form. Many others, however, change their form according to a noun that they represent. The change may indicate “number” (singular / plural), “gender”, “case” (subject / object) or “person” (speaker / addressee / other person). Examples are:

Pronoun Variation within Different Categories

As these show, some pronouns (e.g. I) vary in multiple ways.

Note that one only becomes plural ones when it means “members of an indicated group” (see 63. Constraints on Using “the one[s]”) – there is no plural for the meaning “people in general” (see 211. General Words for People). On the other hand, the possessive one’s is usable only with this latter meaning – see sentence (c) above. Note also that the he-she and him-her gender distinctions are today often avoided (for the sake of equality) through the use of they-them in all cases. For more about -self/-selves, see 143. Subtleties of “-self” Words.

Number is probably the most common cause of pronoun agreement errors (see 28. Pronoun Errors, #5), followed by gender. The problem with this/these is again common. A very frequent non-agreement error with its above is confusing it with it’s. (see 138. Test your Command of Grammar 1, #5).