175. Tricky Word Contrasts 6

.

Some pairs of words are easily confused because of close similarities in spelling and/or meaning

THE PROBLEM OF TRICKY WORD CONTRASTS

Most users of English have encountered vocabulary items that are easily confused because they resemble each other in spelling and/or meaning. A well-known example – often explained in English language coursebooks – is AVOID SOMETHING (= escape from its path) versus PREVENT SOMETHING (= cause it not to happen). The problem is that many of these expressions are never highlighted and can remain completely unrecognised, or at least not fully differentiated.

It is vocabulary pairs like this, especially ones that are likely to occur in professional writing, that are the focus of the present post, just as they are of various others with a similar title (see the “Posts on Specific Words” page for a complete list). Other Guinlist posts that deal with vocabulary confusions include 16. Ways of Distinguishing Similar Words,  44. Troublesome Prepositional Verbs,  94. Essay Instruction Words and 211. General Words for People.

For some grammar confusions, see 129. Differences between Necessity Verbs, 133. Confusions of Similar Structures and 217. Tricky Grammar Contrasts. For some pronunciation ones, see 144. Words that are Often Heard Wrongly.

.

LIST OF CONTRASTS

1. Youth/ Youths/ The Youth/ Young People

Youth has both countable and uncountable meanings. Countable a youth means a youngish person (in their teens or early twenties), while uncountable youth means a phase of life contrasting with middle age and old age. This is a kind of contrast considered in depth in the Guinlist post 43. Substance Locations.

The difference between the countable and uncountable meanings is not a great problem. It is the use of the countable form that can be confusing. The main difficulty is that the plural of this form (youths) rarely refers to a general group – all youngish people – in the way that most plurals can. English mainly uses it for smaller, specific groups, like this:

(a) Youths were observed near the accident scene.

One way to express the more general plural meaning is with the slightly old-fashioned term the youth. With this meaning it has special grammar: as the subject of a sentence it needs a plural verb, like the police, the clergy and the press (see 12. Singular and Plural Verb Choices). Typical uses might be:

(b) The youth of today deserve less criticism.

(c) More opportunities are needed for the youth to be trained.

Another, more frequent use of youth for the group as a whole is before another noun in such phrases as youth club, youth training, youth groups and youth department. Here youth is being used like an adjective (see 38. Nouns Used like Adjectives).

A much more common alternative to the youth for talking about all youngish people is young people. It is used without the, just like most other countable plural nouns with general meaning (see 110. Nouns without “the” or “a”). Note that the young (the + general adjective, the topic of 6. Adjectives with no Noun 1) is not an exact equivalent as it includes younger people than youths.

.

2. Elites/ Members of the Elite

Elites is the plural of the noun an elite, which in Standard English means not an elite person (a possibility in some English varieties) but a group of such people within one particular situation (often a country). Elites therefore means multiple “groups of elite people”. It might be used when comparing such groups in different countries, or different groups in the same country (e.g. the educated elite versus the wealthy elite). For more on Standard English, see the article within these pages entitled Should East African university students try to change the way they speak English?

Members of the elite is a common means of referring to some of the individuals within a particular wider elite. The singular a member… thus refers an individual elite person. Using an elite with this meaning is a similar error to using a bibliography to mean a bibliography entry (see 197. Typical Language of Bibliographies) and a vocabulary to mean a vocabulary item (see 180. Nouns that Count the Uncountable).

To refer to all elite people in the world, it is probably easiest to use the adjective elite rather than the noun (see 255. Nouns Made from Adjectives, #13). As with any adjective you can just place it after the (see 6. Adjectives with no Noun 1), or you can use it without the before people (elite people).

.

3. Far/ Far Away

Like near (see 254. Tricky Word Contrasts 10, #4), far can be an adverb or adjective. As an adverb, it typically refers to a long distance in space or time. Its use depends on its partner verb. With motion verbs like TRAVEL, far is usable by itself. With position verbs like BE LOCATED, however, it needs a following adverb or preposition phrase, such as …away, …off, …above, …in the past or …to the right. With a following comparative adjective or adverb, adverbial far is used by itself to mean “much” (see 194. Adverbs that Say How Much).

The use of the adjective far depends on whether it precedes the noun it is describing or follows it with a link verb like BE in between. In the latter case, the usage is normally the same as that of the adverb far with a position verb: it expresses distance in either space or time, and it needs a following adverb or preposition phrase.

An apparent exception is in exchanges like the following:

(d) – “Jakarta is that way.”
……– “Is it far?”

The probable reason why far is possible here instead of far away is that it does not represent Jakarta, but is probably a “dummy” it representing an unmentioned later verb phrase like to go (see 103. Representing a Later Statement with “it”). Far therefore cannot be an adjective describing it, and must instead be an adverb describing to go. It is this adverb status alongside the motion verb go that makes far usable by itself.

The adjective far used before instead of after its noun differs in meaning with different types of noun. It means “distant” only with time nouns (e.g. the far past/future) or the nouns right/left. Before place nouns, far mostly refers to a part or side of somewhere that is furthest from one being focussed on. For example, the far side of the village probably means the side opposite one that the speaker is next to or is looking at or has recently described. The far distance means “the furthest part of the visible distance”. 

To express the idea of “distant” before a place noun, the adjectives distant or faraway are usually more suitable than far (e.g. a faraway place).

.

4. Classified into/ as

The verb BE CLASSIFIED needs to be used with a class name, such as vertebrates, and one or more names of members of the class, such as mammals. Putting the class name first as subject requires the verb to be followed by into plus the names of all the class members (Vertebrates are classified into mammals, birds…). However, it is also possible to start by naming one or more of the class members as subject, in which case the verb must be followed by as plus the class name (Mammals are classified as vertebrates). For more, see 162. Writing about Classifications.

.

5. Afraid of Doing/ Afraid to Do

To make the right choice here, you must first decide whether or not the fearing person has any choice about the feared event. Where there is no choice, of is always necessary after afraid:

(e) People abandoned plague victims because they were afraid of being infected.

(f) Language learners will not speak if they are afraid of making a mistake.

In (e), of being has to be used – not to be – because being infected is obviously an event that people close to plague victims have no choice about. In (f), although making is an active verb, it probably still has passive-like meaning (see 21. Active Verbs with Non-Active Meanings), suggesting absence of choice and hence once again a need for of.

On the other hand, if the fearing person has a choice regarding what they fear, both of and to are possible. Afraid of suggests fear at all times – something permanent. At the same time, though, it does not imply that the feared action is always avoided: someone can be afraid of something yet still do it.

Afraid to, on the other hand, refers to an action at one specific time. It not only says that someone is experiencing fear about performing that action, but also suggests that as a result the action is not going to be carried out. It is afraid to that is the more likely meaning in the picture above, since the speaker’s swimming costume suggests she has no general fear of swimming.

For a more general discussion of this contrast, see 203. Expanding an Adjective with Words after it, under “Expansion with to and -ing Verbs”.

.

6. Adverse/ Averse

These are both adjectives. Adverse means “unfavourable”, averse “not liking”. Normally, it is events or situations that can be described as adverse, common ones being circumstances, comments, conditions, consequences, criticism, effects, events, publicity, reaction and situations.

On the other hand, averse, in expressing a feeling, normally describes living things. It must usually be followed by to and a noun (or noun equivalent, such as an -ing verb) naming what is not liked (see 111. Words with a Typical Preposition). One might, for example, use averse to with smoking or aeroplanes. One would not, however, use it to express opposition: if you oppose smoking, you would be an adversary of it. Quite often, not is used before averse to create a double negative meaning “accepting” (see 9. Double Negatives).

An important grammatical difference between the two adjectives is their position relative to the noun they describe: adverse usually precedes it, averse follows with a link verb in between (e.g. Dogs are not averse to chocolate). For more on this kind of limitation, see 184. Adjectives with Limited Mobility.

174. Eight Things to Know about Conjunctions

 

Conjunctions are best understood in terms of multiple characteristics rather than just one

THE CHALLENGE OF CONJUNCTIONS

Conjunctions, like prepositionsadverbs and adjectives, can sometimes be difficult to conceptualise and identify. Although there is much information about them elsewhere within this blog, easily accessible by clicking on “conjunctions” in the CATEGORIES menu on the right of this page, bringing their general characteristics together in one place seems desirable to make their appreciation even more convenient.

Common conjunctions include after, although, and, as, because, before, but, if, or, since, than, that, until, when and so. Some comprise two or more words, often ending in thate.g. except that, so that, provided that and as if (see 230. Multi-Word Conjunctions). One characteristic that most people associate with conjunctions is their role as “link” words. Unfortunately, although this is an accurate description, it is rather vague and can mislead. There are various other features that can be more illuminating.

.

CHARACTERISTICS OF CONJUNCTIONS

1. Facilitation of Verb Addition in Sentences

Verbs need to appear in separate sentences, unless they are accompanied by special wording or punctuation that allows their sentence to be shared with one or more other verbs. I call this special wording or punctuation “joining devices” (see 30. When to Write a Full Stop).

Conjunctions are a major kind of joining device. In this role they usually accompany not just the new verb that they introduce into a sentence, but also its subject and any other necessary words. The new verb usually needs an ordinary form – it cannot be an infinitive (with to) or a gerund or a participle. In traditional terms, the verb must be “finite”.

An apparent exception to this rule is shown by the following sentence from 36. Words Left Out to Avoid Repetition:

(a) Most snakes will not bite UNLESS attacked.

The two verbs brought together by the conjunction unless here are underlined. The one that unless introduces appears to be the non-finite “past” participle attacked (passive without BE). However, this is arguably not a true exception. It means the same as the finite they are attacked, and can be considered merely an abbreviation of it. Abbreviation like this seems to be possible when the subject of both verbs is the same (most snakes above), and the conjunction verb includes BE (see 192. When BE can be Omitted).

In most cases, a conjunction is the first word in the part of a sentence that it is introducing. Words from this part that can exceptionally go before a conjunction are mainly adjectives and adverbs. For some examples, see 88. Exotic Grammar Structures 1, #5,  228. Exotic Grammar Structures 5, #5, and 251. The Grammar of “Only”, #1.

Often, a verb added to a sentence by a conjunction will be separated from the other one by a comma. For details of when this may not happen, see 50. Right and Wrong Comma Places.

.

2. Expression of an Inter-Verb Meaning

As well as physically putting verbs together, conjunctions show how the meanings of their statements are related. For example, unless in (a) says the statement after it is naming an exception to a rule stated before it (see 215. Naming Exceptions); because helps to name a cause (see 61. “Since” versus “Because”); so (that) indicates a consequence (see 32. Expressing Consequences); after indicates an earlier event (see 171. Aspects of the Past Perfect Tense); and when can indicate an earlier, later or simultaneous one (see 271. Tricky Grammar Contrasts 3, #4).

This kind of meaning relation is also seen in those adverb-like words that many grammarians call (logical) connectors. What is special about conjunctions, however, is that they usually require the two related verbs to be in the same sentence – connectors need separate sentences (see 40. Conjunctions versus Connectors).

.

3. Grammatical Variation

Conjunctions do not all follow the same grammar rules. The majority, often called “subordinating”, can be used either before two accompanying verbs or between them:

(b) ALTHOUGH whales live in the sea, they are mammals.

(c) Whales are mammals(,) ALTHOUGH they live in the sea.

By contrast, a few conjunctions – and, but, for, nor, not that, only, or, so, than, yet – can only go between the two verbs. For example, but could replace although in (c) but not in (b). Conjunctions of this kind are usually called “coordinating”. They are more likely to have a comma before them than subordinating ones in the same position. Indeed, sometimes they even have a full stop instead of a comma, making them more like connectors than conjunctions (see 25. Conjunction Positioning).

Another difference between the two conjunction types is that only coordinating ones allow a pronoun subject of their verb to be dropped: you could say but live without they in (c) but not *although live (see 36. Words Left Out to Avoid Repetition).

Grammatical variability is not unique to conjunctions; most other word classes show it. Nouns can be “proper”, “countable” or “uncountable”, verbs can be “transitive” or “intransitive” and adverbs can be verb-linked or sentence-linked.

.

4. Influence on Sentence Focus

It often happens that some parts of a sentence are not what the sentence is “about”: they are mentioned only to help appreciation of the main message, or focus. For a full description of this tendency, see 156. Mentioning What the Reader Knows Already.

The words after a conjunction are often not the focus of their sentence. This particularly happens with subordinating conjunctions at the start of a sentence, as in (b). The focus there is on what whales are, not where they live, which the reader is assumed to know already. For more, see 37. Subordination.

.

5. Occasional Use with a Second Conjunction

Sometimes two verbs are fitted into the same sentence not with a single conjunction but by means of a conjunction with each. Conjunction pairs that enable this include both…and, either…or, if…then, not only…but also, no sooner…than and just as…so. For a fuller list with examples, see 64. Double Conjunctions, and also 99. Meanings of “whether…or…”.

.

6. Facilitation of Word-Dropping (Ellipsis)

Two examples of ellipsis accompanying a conjunction have already been given above: of they are after unless in (a), and of they when but replaces although in (c). Ellipsis does not always involve a conjunction, but it often does.

Two particularly common conjunctions in ellipsis constructions are and and as. For various examples involving the former, see 36. Words Left Out to Avoid Repetition64. Double Conjunctions and 68. How Computers Get Grammar Wrong 1.

Ellipsis with as is usually of a verb: 

(d) The Rocky Mountains have been formed recently, as have The Himalayas.

The dropped words here are “been formed recently”. As means “too” (see 159. Exotic Grammar Structures 2, #1). The repeated have shows how auxiliary verbs often work with conjunctions to achieve verb ellipsis (see 237. Auxiliary Verbs in Professional Communication, #1). For more types of ellipsis with as, see 192. When BE can be Omitted.

Than is also common with ellipsis:

(e) Children are often keener to watch TV than (they are to) meet their friends.

If the verb after than (meet above) is the same as the earlier one, it too can be omitted. Care is needed, however, to avoid double meanings (see 233. Structures with a Double Meaning 3, #5).

Albeit seems to accompany ellipsis more often than not (see 191. Exotic Grammar Structures 3, #1).

.

7. Formation of Different Kinds of Structure

Coordinating conjunctions like and usually accompany statements of equal status, neither a part of the other. Subordinating conjunctions, however, make their partner verb and its associated words a subdivision of the statement centred on the other verb.

Most subordinating conjunctions introduce an adverb-like expression within the other verb’s statement. This happens, for example, with although in (b) and (c). Sometimes, though, other expression types are created. Consider this:

(f) Doctors believe THAT exercise is vital.

Here, that and its partner words are replaceable by a noun, not an adverb. They have the noun role of object of believe. That can enable a verb to occupy other noun positions too, like subject and complement (see 153. Conjunction Uses of “that”).

In addition, the conjunction that can introduce adjective-like expressions – adding to the meaning of a preceding noun. Many are a form of indirect speech, as in a statement that…, but there are other possibilities too, such as the arrangement that X does Y.

The indirect question word whether is also usable like that:

(g) Many scholars wonder WHETHER Homer was a real person.

Some grammarians would call whether here a “relative adverb”, but calling it a conjunction instead seems possible.

.

8. Similarity to Prepositions

Conjunctions resemble prepositions in the way they often add information to a sentence, in the kinds of meaning that they have, and sometimes even in their spellings (see 84. Seven Things to Know about Prepositions, #4). The similar way of adding information is by making it adverb-like, as in these examples:

(h) (CONJUNCTION) The war ended WHEN the government collapsed.

(i) (PREPOSITION) The war ended WITH the collapse of the government.

Both of the underlined phrases add time information about a verb (ended) – a typical function of adverbs. The main difference is that the conjunction needs a finite verb (collapsed) whereas the preposition expresses the same meaning with the “action” noun collapse (see 131. Uses of “Action” Nouns, #5).

Many conjunctions are similarly replaceable by a preposition of similar meaning. Other pairs include although/ despite, and/ besides, because/ because of, except that/ except, if/ in the event of, in case/ in case of, like/ just as and while/ during.

In addition, the conjunctions after, as, before, since and until correspond to prepositions spelt exactly the same, evidencing the closeness of the two kinds of word. Consider this conjunction use:

(j) Uganda was a British colony UNTIL it achieved independence in the 1960s.

Here, the verbal it achieved is easily replaceable by the noun phrase its achievement of, converting until into a preposition.

One major benefit of the preposition-conjunction correspondence is that it can help paraphrasing (see 205. Paraphrasing Prepositions with Words of Other Kinds).

.

Comment Transferred from HOME Page

Yadgiri Kunta asked “What is the relation between main verb & Aux verb and finite & non-finite verbs.
eg. The children are playing.  John is sleeping.
Though playing and sleeping are non-finite verbs (or forms of verbs), are they still main verbs in the sentences?

.

Answer: Most authorities would probably say that the main verb in auxiliary-containing combinations like is sleeping is the entire combination, not any of the individual words within it. This is despite the fact that the non-auxiliary word in the combination (sleeping) completely follows the rule for existing in a sentence with a “main” verb: it contains the “joining device” -ing (see 30. When to Write a Full Stop).

The concept of “main verb” is generally associated not so much with words inside individual verb phrases like is sleeping (and others without an auxiliary, like wants to go) as with different lexical verbs in more widely-separated parts of the same sentence.