14. Noun Countability Clues 1: Action Outcomes

.

Some nouns express an action when they are uncountable and the result of the action when countable

THE DIFFICULTY OF DECIDING NOUN COUNTABILITY

Being able to recognise whether nouns are “countable” or “uncountable” is fundamental for using them correctly (see 110. Nouns without “the” or “a”). Noun countability is thus a common topic in elementary English courses. However, it is also an aspect of English that continues to trouble even very proficient users, which is why it is the topic here. This is the first of four Guinlist posts about it. The others are 19. Activity Locations, 23. Subtypes and 43. Substance Locations.

Most readers will know that the terms “countable” and “uncountable” refer not to what nouns mean but to what they do. They tell us not about the ability or otherwise of the idea expressed by the noun to “be counted”, but rather about the grammar rules that the noun must follow. Only “countable” nouns, for example, can be made plural. Only “uncountable” nouns can be singular without an article. “Uncountable” nouns can follow all but not each or every (see 169. “All”, “Each” and “Every”); singular “countable” nouns cannot follow enough (see 189. Expressing Sufficiency). Countability can even affect vocabulary choices (see 81. Tricky Word Contrasts 2, #9).

The reason for calling these two types of noun “countable” and “uncountable” is that this can seem a useful means of recognising which nouns are which: many nouns that can be made plural are obviously able to be counted, and many that cannot be plural are obviously unable to be counted. The problem, however, is that there are also many nouns whose ability or not to be counted is unclear. Luggage, for example, can be thought of as either a collection of individual bags carried by travellers – an eminently countable concept – or as something travellers carry that has no fixed size or shape.

An interesting indicator of the subjectivity of “ability to be counted” is the fact that some noun meanings that are expressed by an “uncountable” noun in English are expressed by “countable” nouns in other languages with a similar way of classifying nouns. Examples are access, advice, information and research (all countable in French) and construction meaning “building” (countable in Italian and Spanish). It is also notable that some “uncountable” English nouns are much more likely than others to be incorrectly used in a “countable” way by speakers of languages with no countability distinction (e.g. *luggages, *punctuations).

In fact, even English recognises that many “uncountable” nouns do actually represent an idea that can as easily be thought of as able to be counted as unable. This is clear from the existence of a large number of “uncountable” nouns that can be combined with a “countable” noun in order to act in a “countable” way, as in pieces of luggage, forms of transport and research projects. The combinations commonly taught to elementary-level learners are only a small sample of the possibilities (see 180. Nouns that Count the Uncountable).

So what better way is there of discovering how to use individual English nouns? As with the transitivity of verbs (see 113. Verbs that cannot be Passive), the surest way is to find out from a dictionary. Failing that, however, a more sophisticated look could perhaps be given to the kind of meaning possessed by the noun. Ability to be counted can on occasion be helpful, and there is also some value in the common assertion that many “uncountable” nouns like flour and water represent a “mass” of something, with no fixed shape, rather than something discrete.

There is, however, a further type of meaning clue, which is not usually highlighted in grammar books. A very large number of nouns are sometimes used in a “countable” way and sometimes in an “uncountable” one, depending on their meaning, but the difference between the two meanings rarely has anything to do with ability to be counted or with shape. It is not always the same kind of difference, but some kinds are very common, so that there seems to be value in making them clear and indicating the nouns that possess them.

At least four major kinds of difference seem to be possible between the “countable” and “uncountable” meanings of individual nouns. This post is about one of these four: an “action” meaning when the noun is “uncountable” versus an “action outcome” meaning of the “countable” form. The other three meaning differences are the topics of the three similar posts to this that are listed above.

.

ACTIONS AND ACTION OUTCOMES

A large number of nouns express an action when they are uncountable and an action outcome when countable. Take creation. The action meaning may be illustrated as follows:

(a) Creation of new styles is a priority for fashion designers.

An indication that creation here is expressing an action is that it (and the following of) can be replaced by the verb creating. The fact that creation is uncountable is shown by its use in the singular form without any other word in front of it (see 110. Nouns without “the” or “a”). For some suggestions about using a noun rather than a verb to express an action, see 39. “Decide” or “Make a Decision”? and 131. Uses of “Action” Nouns.

On the other hand, the action-outcome meaning might be illustrated like this:

(b) The designer was showing off one of her creations.

Creations here is not an “action” noun: it cannot be replaced by creating. Rather, it refers to something remaining after the action, in other words its outcome. The fact that it is countable is clear from the plural -s ending.

Many other nouns express an action when uncountable and an action outcome otherwise. Possession, for example, means “taking ownership” (or “having ownership”) in its uncountable form, but “something owned” when countable. Uncountable injury means “the creation of physical damage”, while countable an injury just means “physical damage”. See also development in 201. Words with Complicated Grammar.

Nouns meaning either an action or an action outcome are usually derived from verbs. Examples are:

                         VERB                                       DERIVED NOUN

                        create                                           creation

                        possess                                        possession

                        injure                                           injury

                        close                                            closure

                        improve                                      improvement

                        prefer                                          preference

                        increase                                      increase

                        analyse                                        analysis

                       choose                                         choice

                       compare                                     comparison

                       reverse                                        reversal

These nouns are typically made by adding a characteristic suffix: -tion, -sion, -age, -y, -ure, -ment, -ence/-ance, -al, or nothing at all (see 249. Action Noun Endings).

The action/outcome contrast is a very useful way of deciding countability, but unfortunately it is not completely reliable, as some nouns behave exceptionally. For a detailed survey, see 280. Alternative Meanings of “Action” Nouns. To give a flavour, here are a few examples.

Some exceptional nouns – legislation, motivation and research, for instance – are uncountable with both the “action” and the “action outcome” meaning (for details of motivation, see 276. Tricky Word Contrasts 11, #2). Others, such as rise, fall, increase, decrease and many of their synonyms (for a list, see 115. Surveying Numerical Data) are countable in both cases.

Other nouns have only one of the two meanings. Discrimination, storage and emergence (all 100% uncountable) only express an action (for details of emergence, see 157. Tricky Word Contrasts 5, #3). The action outcome of storage is expressed by the different (countable) noun a store.

On the other hand, advice (always uncountable) only expresses an action outcome, as does edition (always countable), its action being expressed by publication (see 197. The Language of Bibliographies). Always-countable -ing nouns like building, clearing and painting likewise refer only to an action outcome, the action itself being expressed by the related verb in its “gerund” form (see 240. Nouns that End with “-ing”).

Finally, note that many nouns, such as carriage, do match an action and a non-action meaning with uncountable and countable usage, but their non-action meaning is not an action outcome. For details, see 19. Activity Locations.

.

PRACTICE EXERCISES (ACTION OUTCOMES

The first of the two exercises below aims to develop familiarity with nouns expressing action outcomes. The second is about identifying the correct noun meaning in a text.

Exercise 1

Here are some more nouns derived from verbs. They nearly all have both an action and an outcome meaning. Can you find one among them which usually has only the action meaning?

ADAPTATION, DISCOVERY, INTRODUCTION, GROWTH, MEASUREMENT, INJURY, SUPPORT, STATEMENT, ASSISTANCE, IMPLICATION, RECEIPT, LOSS, CHOICE, SALE, PURCHASE.

The exceptional noun here is assistance (= the action of assisting). We cannot usually say *an assistance.

.

Exercise 2

This exercise is taken from my book Grammar Practice for Professional Writing. You have to compare the two CAPITALISED nouns in each sentence pair below, and choose the sentence where the noun stands for an action (answers below).

.

1. (a) The RECEIPT for goods must be kept.

    (b) RECEIPT of goods must be recorded.

2. (a) Creatures can survive in a new environment through ADAPTATION.

    (b) Creatures acquire ADAPTATIONS in order to survive in a new environment.

3. (a) Try to speak without REFERENCE to your notes.

    (b) A job application usually needs to include a REFERENCE.

4. (a) Airlines should be informed about LOSS of luggage.

     (b) If there is a LOSS in the accounts, it should be visible.

5. (a) SUCCESS in business will lead to wealth.

    (b) Abba were A SUCCESS in music because of their harmonies.

6. (a) Costs may prevent any DISCOVERY from being marketed.

    (b) Costs may prevent any DISCOVERY.

.

ANSWERS1(b) – note the different prepositions, of showing the action;  2(a);  3(a);  4(a);  5(a);  6(b).

13. Reading Obstacles 7: Hidden Negatives

.

HidNegPic

Important negative meanings can be missed because they are not always in familiar simple words like “not”

DEFINITION OF HIDDEN NEGATIVES

Negative statements do not always contain the fundamental negative words not, no, never etc., There are very many ordinary words whose meaning includes the negativeness of these words (see 310. Aspects of Negation). Some contain familiar negative word parts such as un-, in-, dis-, mis- and -less (see 106. Word-like Suffixes and 146. Some Important Prefix Types). Many others, though – of all grammatical types – express negative meaning without any obviously negative feature at all.

Take the adjective debatable. It seems to be a synonym of arguable, but it has a negativity that arguable lacks. It suggests the writer’s disagreement with a statement in the same way as questionable (see 152. Agreeing and Disagreeing in Formal Contexts). Similarly, the conjunction let alone has no obviously negative components but its meaning includes the idea of not (see 191. Exotic Grammar Structures 3, #2).

Expressions like debatable and let alone are examples of what I call hidden negatives. Many are also described as having a “negative connotation” (see 16. Ways of Distinguishing Similar Words, #2). In this post I wish to illustrate their importance and variety, and to provide some practice in recognising them. For a few further examples, see 284. Words with a Surprising Meaning.

.

THE VALUE TO WRITERS OF HIDDEN NEGATIVES

Negative statements in general are common in professional writing and newspaper opinion columns because these kinds of writing so often have to make judgements – a kind of statement that is necessarily sometimes negative (see 152. Agreeing and Disagreeing in Formal Contexts and 168. Ways of Arguing 2).

Hidden negatives have at least two important uses in the expression of judgements. Firstly, they are often more polite than negatives of a more obvious kind – a valuable property in professional writing (see 166. Appropriacy in Professional English). Secondly, they allow variety in the way that negative meaning is expressed – important when negative statements are being made in large numbers (see 5. Repetition with Synonyms).

.

PRACTICE IN THE RECOGNITION OF HIDDEN NEGATIVES

Negative meaning in a statement is as important as any other meaning. This is clear from considering a sentence like Hippopotamuses are not safe to approach: if we fail to notice not, the opposite meaning from the intended one will be understood, with possibly fatal consequences. Happily, normal negatives like not are rarely missed, because they are so familiar to us. Hidden negatives, on the other hand, are much easier to miss, because they will not be so familiar.

To provide practice in the recognition of hidden negatives, an exercise below presents eleven different examples to try and identify. First, though, it may help to analyse some other examples. Consider the words excessive, overstated, extreme, speculative, at first sight, on paper, feeble, limited, naive and hard to accept. The first three all indicate a problem with something because it is more than what is considered acceptable. A typical use might be:

(a) The dangers of nuclear energy are overstated.

The writer is here arguing in favour of nuclear energy by suggesting it is less dangerous than is usually claimed. The meaning is similar to that of too, a more well-known word that is suggestive of a negative excess (see 189. Expressing Sufficiency).

The word speculative once occurred in an academic research article that I gave to some students to read. The writer used it to dismiss a theory because it was not based on proper research. It means “based on intuition or reflection”. While ideas based on intuition or reflection may be more acceptable in a subject like philosophy, in a social science intuition without empirical research evidence is considered to be a weakness. My students, unfortunately, did not appreciate that, and thought that the writer was recommending the theory in question instead of criticising it.

The phrases at first sight and on paper are among a surprising number of expressions that suggest the real nature of something is worse than its observable one (see 319. Superficiality). Corresponding adverbs are superficially (see 85. Preposition Phrases & Corresponding Adverbs) and apparently (see 132. Tricky Word Contrasts 4, #7).

With at first sight and superficially, good things can seem bad and bad things can seem good. On paper suggests that something intended to be good is not actually so. Hence, if we see any of these expressions accompanying a positive description of something, we should understand that the positiveness is false. Consider this example:

(b) At first sight, buying furniture made from artificial wood is good value for money.

The message here is that such furniture is not really good value for money!

The word feeble illustrates another common feature of hidden negatives: metaphorical meaning (see 4. Metaphorical Meanings). The base meaning, “extremely weak”, is about health. Used to describe, say, an argument, it suggests disagreement.

Now here is the practice exercise. The task is to find a hidden negative in all of the following statements except one. Answers are given afterwards.

1. In view of its effect on health, smoking has little justification.

2. The power of government spending to eradicate poverty is a myth.

3. Another bogus idea is that football success can be achieved without money.

4. There is a degree of truth in the claim that British colonialism brought benefits as well as suffering.

5. The teaching of grammatical structures by means of parrot-like repetition is justified on quite shaky grounds.

6. The construction of new roads is an all too easy solution to the problem of traffic congestion.

7. Women are better at learning languages than men, according to some wishful thinkers.

8. The notion that poverty is a self-inflicted evil must be dismissed immediately.

9. The use of mosquito nets is an apparently simple solution to the problem of malaria in tropical countries.

10. Suggesting that future humans will live for 150 years or more stretches belief a little.

11. Weight can be lost without exercising, it is often erroneously believed.

12. A flimsy case is sometimes made that humans did not really visit the moon in 1969.

.

Answers:

1 = little (not to be confused with the positive a little! – see 310. Aspects of Negation, #2).

2 = a myth (= “an untrue story”. Note also the adjective mythical. Both words are of Greek origin – see 90. The Greek Impact on English Vocabulary).

3 = bogus

4 = No negative word. A degree of is positive like a little and a few

5 = shaky (another good example of a metaphorical negative)

6 = (all) too (similar in meaning to excessive, overstated and extreme). Adding all is emphatic.

7 = wishful thinkers (wishful nearly always accompanies some form of THINK. It suggests impossible dreams).

8 = dismissed

9 = apparently (similar in meaning to superficially – not to be confused with obviously).

10 = stretches belief (rather a polite expression: the negative meaning is made less brutal by the idea of “stretching” instead of breaking)

11 = erroneously

12 = flimsy (another word meaning “weak”, like feeble, shaky, fragile and thin)