164. Fixed Preposition Phrases

.

English prepositions make some very familiar phrases with certain partner words

TYPES OF PREPOSITION PHRASE

Prepositions partner a following noun or equivalent, the combination often being called a preposition phrase (see 84. Seven Things to Know about Prepositions, #1). In many preposition phrases, the preposition can vary to express different preposition meanings. It might, for example, mark the following noun as the cause of an action (by), or an “instrument” (with), or a location (in), or an origin (from).

Other preposition choices, however, vary less. In some cases, the noun does not logically allow many preposition possibilities, or naturally requires one or a few much more than others. Take, for example, the noun a map. If we talk about maps, we are more likely to be discussing their content than other preposition-inducing ideas like their position in space or time. As a result, the preposition for linking map content with the noun map, which happens to be on, is very much a “typical” preposition with that noun (see 111. Words with a Typical Preposition).

In the most extreme cases, a particular noun will always or nearly always have the same preceding preposition. In the phrase on the whole, for example, on cannot be replaced by any other preposition. This is what I mean by a “fixed” preposition phrase. Its fixedness places it within the class of “idioms”, which themselves illustrate the wider idea of “collocations”, or word partnerships.

This post surveys the wide variety of fixed preposition phrases that can appear in formal English writing. There is more on collocation in numerous other Guinlist posts, notably 16. Ways of Distinguishing Similar Words (#5), 173. “Do Research” or “Make Research”, 194. Adverbs that Say How Much209. Fixed Phrases with “and” and 273. Verb-Object-Collocations.

.

LIST OF PHRASES

The following list is not exhaustive. It concentrates on phrases beginning with the most common prepositions, and completely excludes phrases with a multi-word preposition, such as next to nothing (see 221. Multi-Word Prepositions). Even the included prepositions probably make fixed phrases that are not mentioned.

There is also some subjectivity about the fixedness of the phrases: some might disagree. However, it is knowing the phrases rather than their fixedness that is ultimately what matters. For some less-fixed similar phrases, see 85. Preposition Phrases and Corresponding Adverbs.

ABOVE

above all (else/others), above ground, above oneself, above the law, above suspicion

AFTER

after all, after a while, after a/some time, after dark, after that, after the event

AS

as a consequence, as a preliminary (to…), as a reminder, as a result, as a reward, as a rule, as a whole, as compensation, as usual

AT

at a guess, at all, at all costs, at a loss, at any rate, at arm’s length, at a standstill, at a time, at bay, at best, at ease, at every opportunity, at every turn, at fault, at first, at first hand, at first sight, at full stretch, at hand, at …’s insistence, at intervals, at large, at last, at least, at length, at odds, at once, at peace, at present, at random, at rest, at risk, at speed, at that, at the beginning/ start/ end, at the end of the day, at the first attempt, at the/this moment, at (the) most, at the outset, at the same time, at the time, at times, at will, at worst

BEYOND

beyond assistance, beyond belief, beyond compare, beyond comparison, beyond dispute, beyond doubt, beyond expectation(s), beyond help. beyond hope, beyond recall, beyond recognition, beyond reproach, beyond the call of duty, beyond one’s wildest dreams

BY

by accident, by all accounts/reports, by all/no means, by analogy, by arrangement, by a wide/narrow margin, by birth, by candlelight, by chance, by coincidence, by common consent, by comparison, by contrast, by custom, by day, by default, by definition, by degrees, by design, by every means, by extension, by far, by force, by implication, by law, by mistake, by name, by (their) nature, by night, by no means, by now, by profession, by reference to …, by reputation, by repute, by return, by rights, by -self, by the same token, by the way, by way of …, by word of mouth

FOR

for a change, for ages, for all …’s worth, for a moment, for a (…) reason, for a start, for a time, for a while, for certain, for convenience, for emphasis, for good, for good measure, for good reason, for life, for now, for once in a while, for sure, for the moment, for the most part, for the record, for the time being, for this purpose, for weeks, for what it is worth

FROM

from a … perspective, from all the evidence, from day one, from day to day, from every angle, from memory, from side to side, from the first, from the horse’s mouth, from the start, from time to time, from top to bottom

IN

in a … capacity, in addition, in advance, in all, in all likelihood, in all probability, in all sincerity, in a mess, in anger, in answer, in a quandary, in a rage, in a sense, in a … way, in brief, in charge, in circulation, in command, in common parlance, in conclusion, in consequence, in contrast, in control, in danger, in days gone by, in denial, in depth, in difficulty, in disgrace, in dispute, in doubt, in droves, in due course, in effect, in error, in essence, in fairness, in favour, in fits and starts, in full, in full flow, in general, in hand, in large numbers, in line, in no time, in one go, in order, in other words, in parallel, in particular, in position, in practice, in principle, in profusion, in progress, in public, in question, in reality, in reply, in response, in sequence, in short supply, in sum(mary), in tandem, in tatters, in … terms, in that case, in the black, in the clear, in the dark, in the end, in the extreme, in the eyes of …, in the final analysis, in (the) first place, in the fullness of time, in the long run/term, in the main, in the meantime, in the nick of time, in theory, in the process, in the red, in the way, in this case, in this instance, in this respect, in time, in total, in touch, in transit, in truth, in turn, in unison

OF

of a kind, of … kinds, of all things, of benefit, of concern, of consequence, of course, of good reputation, of importance, of interest, of late, of necessity, of note, of … own accord, of significance, of sorts, of substance, of the same kind/name, of use, of value

OFF

off colour, off duty, off limits, off the beaten track, off the pace, off the record, off the scale, off the top

ON

on a … basis, on a large/small scale, on all sides, on a par, on average, on balance, on his/her/its (etc.) best behaviour, on board, on close inspection, on closer analysis/examination, on condition that …, on end, on fire, on (his/her/its etc.) guard, on high alert, on impulse, on occasion, on paper, on purpose, on reflection, on sale, on … terms, on the alert, on the assumption that…, on the brink, on the contrary, on the evidence of … , on the face of it, on the go, on the increase, on the lookout for…, on the make, on the mend, on the move, on the other hand, on the surface, on the understanding that …, on the whole, on (the) top

OUT OF

out of action, out of all proportion, out of bounds, out of circulation, out of contract, out of control, out of date, out of fashion, out of favour, out of kilter, out of kindness, out of love, out of order, out of phase, out of sorts, out of step, out of the norm, out of the ordinary, out of the question, out of spite, out of time, out of touch

TO

to a degree, to all appearances, to all intents and purposes, to a great/small extent, to great (or the same) effect, to my mind, to no avail, to perfection, to (someone’s) surprise, to the contrary, to the naked eye, to the uninitiated, to this day, to this end

UNDER

under attack, under consideration, under construction, under contract, under control, under inspection, under licence, under no illusions, under oath, under observation, under pressure, under review, under supervision, under surveillance, under the auspices of…, under the circumstances, under the impression that…, under the influence of…, under the ownership of

WITH

with concern, with delight, with difficulty, with dignity, with dismay, with due consideration, with hindsight, with love, with pleasure, with relish, with regard to, with regret, with (due) respect, with respect to, with satisfaction, with surprise, with that in mind

WITHIN

within one’s capacity, within limits, within living memory, within minutes, within range, within (easy) reach, within reason, within sight, within the rules, within touching distance, within view

WITHOUT

without assistance, without delay, without doubt, without end, without exception, without fail, without hesitation, without hindrance, without question, without success

.

OBSERVATIONS

1. Grammatical Function

Ordinary preposition phrases (i.e. not “fixed” in the sense described above) tend to have various alternative uses in a sentence. The same phrase may act like an adjective (adding information about a previous noun) or like an adverb (adding information about a verb, adjective, adverb or whole sentence). Consider the like phrase in the following:

(a) An illness like influenza was produced by the virus. (ADJECTIVE USE 1)

(b) The illness produced by the virus was like influenza. (ADJECTIVE USE 2)

(c) The illness acted like influenza. (ADVERB USE 1)

(d) Like influenza, the virus caused a fever. (ADVERB USE 2)

Here, like influenza in (a) and (b) is adjectival because it adds information about a noun (illness). In (a), it occupies one of the two typical positions of adjectival preposition phrases – directly after the noun – while in (b) it occupies the other – later with a link verb (was) in between (see 53. “As”, “Like” and “Such As”).

In (c) and (d), on the other hand, like influenza resembles an adverb because it adds information to the same parts of a sentence that adverbs do. In (c), it adds to the verb acted, while in (d) it adds to the sentence as a whole (see 121. Sentence-Spanning Adverbs.

Every adjective and adverb role can be filled by a fixed preposition phrase, but many individual phrases have fewer roles. For example, as a whole, which means “considered altogether”, seems to have only adjective use 1 – directly after a noun (of the “collective” kind), as in Asia as a whole. This is very different from on the whole (= “typically”), which has not only adjective use 1 but also adverb use 2 (see 308. Complexities of “Whole”, last section).

Generally, however, fixed preposition phrases with an exclusively adjective use seem quite rare. Phrases beginning with of tend to be of this kind (see 160. Uses of “of”), though of late and of necessity are adverbial. Fixed out of phrases – excepting those with an emotion noun like spite – are usually adjectival. About 50% of on phrases are so (on end, on the alert, on the brink, on the cards, on the increase). At a loss is adjectival, and at a time (= on each occasion) just has adjective use 1 (usually after a number + noun, e.g. 3 people…). In tatters and in position only have adjective use 2. In order does when meaning “tidy”, but is mostly adverbial when meaning “in sequence”.

Phrases that could be either adjectival or adverbial also tend to be in particular groups. One is phrases with beyond, which are common after a link verb (adjective use 2), but can also be adverb-like if used with particular other verbs, especially PLACE and ACT. Beyond doubt could also start a sentence as a sentence adverb:

(e) Beyond doubt, some professional athletes use illegal drugs.

Similar mixed possibilities exist with above phrases (though above all is only a sentence adverb), many in phrases (notable exceptions being the sentence adverbs in contrast and in time), out of, under and within.

Among phrases with a predominantly adverbial use, in time can be not only sentence-orientated (In time, …) meaning “when some time has passed”, but also verb-orientated meaning “not late” (…arrived in time). Also notable is in the extreme, meaning “very”, which is only found after adjectives.

There are surprisingly many phrases that are typically used as “connectors”, sentence adverbs showing a link with another sentence. Examples are after all, at that, by contrast and in consequence. For a full list, see 259. Multi-Word Connectors

Many for phrases express a time period – a common adverb meaning. They are indeed mostly used adverbially, especially since some, like for weeks, replace for with lasting in adjective position 1 (see 258. Saying How Long Something Lasts).

Fixed phrases with with tend to be adverbial, perhaps because with is the most typical preposition for converting an adverb into a corresponding preposition phrase (see 85. Preposition Phrases & Corresponding Adverbs). From, on and without also tend to create adverbial phrases, though some, like on end, on fire and without end are usually or sometimes adjectival instead. Finally, as phrases excepting as a whole seem always to be adverbial.

.

2. Constituent “Noun” Forms

In most cases, the noun after the preposition lacks the. However, the exceptions have mostly normal explanations, such as other descriptive words following the noun (beyond the call of duty, on the understanding that …), the noun representing something solitary (at the first attempt, out of the norm), the noun replaced by a lone adjective (to the uninitiated, out of the ordinary – see 6. Adjectives with no Noun 1), or the noun referring to a part of the body (to the naked eye – see 89. Using “the” with General Meaning).

The only examples where the does not seem to have a standard explanation involve “nouns” that are normally verbs (on the go, on the make – but not without fail), which are reminiscent of expressions like have a go (see 116. Rarer Uses of HAVE).

Also notable is the fairly frequent breaking of the rule that singular countable nouns need an article (see 110. Nouns without “the” or “a”). This happens, for example, in above ground, at hand, at will, by law (and many other by phrases), for good reason, from side to side, in line, in principle, in question, in total, in turn, on average, on end, on purpose, out of date (and many other out of phrases), within range, within reason and without end. Most seem predominantly adjectival (exceptions are underlined).

Finally, there are some phrases with just an adjective and no noun – surprising given that prepositions normally need a following noun. Some of these adjectives are in the superlative form without the (at best, at last, at least, at worst). Others (the clear, the dark, the black, the red) are base forms with the – a possibility that is much rarer in English than in some other languages (see 102. Adjectives with no Noun 2). Others again are simple base forms (at large, by far, for good, for sure, in full, in general, of late). Also notable is at once, once being an adverb.

.

3. “Action” Noun Involvement

Action nouns are made from verbs and express verb-like meanings (see 131. Uses of “Action” Nouns). Some of the prepositions listed above seem more likely than others to accompany an action noun. Particularly noticeable are beyond (followed by nouns like belief and recognition), under (consideration, review) and without (doubt, hesitation).

Beyond compare is a more poetic alternative to beyond comparison. Compare is probably a noun rather than the verb. Under gives passive meaning to an action noun, but seems usable only with a very few such nouns.

163. Ways of Naming Properties

.

Properties of things can be named in a variety of ways

PROPERTY-NAMING IN PROFESSIONAL WRITING

A property is a permanent attribute of a category of things. Properties have their own physical existence – they do not just exist in the minds of human beings as names do (see 206. Ways of Stating a Name). They may be permanently observable, like the colour of gold, or a potential that is always reached under suitable circumstances, such as the boiling point of water or the top speed of a racing car. The word property used in this way is obviously a countable noun: able to be either plural, as above, or singular with a/the. Used uncountably it means “possessions”.

It is easy to believe that property-naming is only important in science and technology writing, for the obvious reason that those areas have a particular interest in identifying and analysing properties. However, most types of professional writing will sometimes need to highlight a property of something, whether of demand curves or exchange rates in economics, sentences in linguistics, or poetry in literary analysis.

To name a property, it is very common to indicate both the general type of property in question (e.g. colour) and its detail in the thing possessing it (e.g. green). The language for giving this information in English is quite varied, and can be confusing as a result. Many coursebooks simply present it as lists. Here I wish to examine the possibilities in more depth, illustrating their surprising range and variety and suggesting some reasons for choosing one rather than another.

Readers seeking more Guinlist posts about simple description are referred to 115. Surveying Numerical Data,  149. Saying how Things are Similar,  151. Ways of Using Compass Words196. Saying What is inside Things,  210. Process Descriptions and 295. Options in Saying Where.

.

PROPERTY-NAMING WITH have

It would be surprising if HAVE was not usable for naming a property, given that properties are usually thought of as “belonging to” things, an idea that is centrally associated with HAVE (see 116. Rarer Uses of HAVE). The most common way in which HAVE seems to be used is as follows:

(a) The Earth has a diameter of 12,742 km.

Here, the property type diameter is written (with a) directly after has, and the detail 12,742 km is added next with of. Very many property types can be fitted into this structure, including acceleration, acidity (pH), angle, area, breadth, capacity, circumference, density, depth, duration, fluctuation, force, frequency, gradient, height, length, mass, radius, rhythm, span, specific gravity, speed, thickness, value, velocity, volume, weight and width. For more about duration, see 258. Saying How Long Something Lasts, #7.

However, there are some property details that cannot be named in an of phrase as above, but can still follow HAVE in a slightly different way:

(b) Nitrogen dioxide has an acrid smell.

Here, where the property type smell is again the object of has, the detail acrid is an adjective before it rather than part of a following of phrase. There is a clear reason why: acrid is non-mathematical, expressing a quality rather than a quantity. Smells can only be described with such words. Other property kinds with the same limitation include appearance, colour, shape, taste and texture. For more about describing colours, see 278. Colours.

There is a slight problem, however, in naming shapes. It arises from the fact that shape adjectives are of two different kinds: some made by giving a shape noun an ordinary adjective ending (usually -ar or -al, e.g. circular, conical, cylindrical, pyramidal, spherical, square and triangular); others comprising a shape noun with -shaped, e.g. crescent-shaped, disc-shaped, egg-shaped, kidney-shaped, pear-shaped, star-shaped and wedge-shaped.

Obviously, the first type of adjective easily fits the pattern has a … shape, but the second would result in the repetitive has a …-shaped shape. This latter is avoided either by changing -shaped into shape (e.g. has a star shape) or by using BE instead of HAVE (e.g. is star-shaped: see below). It would not be logical to say *is a star shape (see 303. Confusions of Similar Structures 4, #7).

Properties that can be named in a mathematical way can often also be named in the way shown by (b) – though with less precision. For example, we can say that something has a steep gradient, a high frequency, sharp acceleration or a rapid rhythm. This kind of expression is particularly useful in interpretations of numerical data, where we might need to clarify for the reader whether a particular quantity is large or small (see 115. Surveying Numerical Data). Note the variability of the adjectives – they are often specific to the nouns (i.e. they form “collocations” – see 16. Ways of Distinguishing Similar Words, #2).

Sometimes, when an adjective is needed, it can be hard to think of one. In such cases, a special kind of preposition phrase is normally possible instead:

(c) The Spanish “j” has a sound like the English /h/.

(d) Sirius almost has the brightness of a planet.

The typical prepositions seem to be of and like. Note that the noun before of needs the rather than a.

.

PROPERTY-NAMING WITH be

Most properties seem able to be named with BE. The easiest way is by starting the sentence with the property type:

(e) The diameter of the Earth is 12,742 km.

(f) The colour of chlorophyll is mostly green.

It will be observed that the idea of possession, previously expressed by HAVE, is now in the preposition of. It can also be expressed by means of an apostrophe ending – The Earth’s diameter in (e) (see 58. Optional Apostrophe Endings). Sentences starting The shape of… end sometimes with an adjective (…is conical), sometimes with …is like a (+ shape noun).

Although BE is an alternative to HAVE, it is not a complete equivalent. This is because the changed word order – illustrated by the difference between (e) and (a) – gives different importance to the different parts (see 156. Mentioning What the Reader Knows Already, #10).

BE is also possible with the owner of a property as its subject, just like HAVE. A common pattern, especially with non-mathematical properties, is:

(g) Chlorophyll is generally green in colour.

Here, the property detail (green) is again an adjective after the verb, but the property type needs to follow in at the end. This pattern is usable for all non-mathematical properties except those expressed with a -shaped adjective, which for obvious reasons drop the final in phrase. The other adjectives may also drop it if it seems to be stating the obvious.

Nouns that name a property type after a property adjective + in can alternatively replace in with a hyphen and end with -ed. For example, green in colour can become green-coloured. Such combinations look like -shaped combinations, but they differ in that the first half is an adjective, not a noun like star-. Other examples are double-edged, flat-topped, many-sided, open-ended, regular-patterned, rough-textured, smooth-surfaced and soft-centred (see 291. Subtleties of “-ed”, #7).

With -sided, exact numbers like 3- can replace many-, which is surprising because exact numbers normally combine with a noun lacking -ed when describing another noun, e.g. two-stroke engines (see 136. Types of Description by Nouns, #4).

Note the hyphens in these examples. One is always necessary, regardless of whether the combination is directly before a noun or after one separated by BE (see 223. Uses of Hyphens, #4). Note too that -ed meaning “having” on an adjective-noun combination is not confined to property-naming; it is also common in everyday English to describe characteristics of living things, as in long-haired, quick-witted and thick-skinned.

There are also some combinations of an adjective with an -ing word rather than an -ed one, such as rough-feeling, sour-tasting, yellow-looking and difficult-seeming. The need for -ing rather than -ed arises when the word it is being added to is a verb (feel, taste etc.) rather than a noun like edge or hair. The verbs tend to be the kind that normally have a complement rather than object (see 220. Features of Complements, #2). For more about participles after a hyphen, see the end of 106. Word-Like Suffixes.

BE and a hyphenated word combination can also indicate mathematical properties, though only in a non-precise, interpretational way. The first word in the combination is often low or high, the second a noun without -ed or -ing. Examples are low-strength, high-resistance and high-density. Sometimes, an adverb-participle combination is found instead, such as fast-travelling or widely-separated.

It is only some mathematical properties that can be specified exactly in sentences like (g), where the property owner precedes BE + exact property detail + in + property type. One of them is height:

(h) Mount Kilimanjaro is roughly 5890 metres in height.

This kind of naming is possible with all of the dimension properties (breadth, circumference, depth, diameter, duration, height, length, span, thickness and width), and also with mass, volume and weight.

In dimension-naming sentences like (h), the in phrase at the end can be paraphrased with a simple adjective – high instead of in height (see 270. Paraphrasing Adjectives with Words of Other Kinds, #3). The relevant adjectives – corresponding to the list above – are broad, around, deep, across, long, high, long (again), across (again), thick and wide.

.

PROPERTY-NAMING WITH OTHER VERBS

When HAVE and BE are used, the property type has to be an accompanying noun or adjective. However, many property types can also be expressed with a verb, like this:

(h) A litre of water weighs 1 kg.

The verb here identifies the property type as “weight”, and the word(s) after the verb (1 kg.) express the property’s detail. Other verbs like WEIGH include ACCELERATE, AVERAGE, BOIL, COVER (+ area), EXTEND (+ distance), EQUAL (+ number), FEEL, FREEZE, GO (+ time/distance), HOLD (+ capacity), LAST, LOOK, MEASURE (+ dimension), MELT, OCCUPY (+ volume), SOUND, STRETCH (+ distance), TASTE, TRAVEL and TURN.

The grammar of these verbs is quite variable. The underlined ones have the detail of the property as their object like WEIGH. Although these verbs are “transitive”, their property-naming use is not normally possible in the passive voice (see 113. Verbs that cannot be Passive). Only HOLD in the list above is exceptional.

By contrast, FEEL, LOOK, SOUND, TASTE and TURN need a complement rather than an object, normally in adjective form (e.g. feels smooth, tastes bitter). GO can have a complement too (goes/turns red – see 176. Ways of Using GO). GO, EXTEND, LAST, STRETCH and TRAVEL additionally allow their object of distance or time to become a preposition phrase beginning with for. ACCELERATE, BOIL, FREEZE and MELT can only have a following preposition phrase, usually one beginning with at.